Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39739205›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2024

A large-scale database of Mandarin Chinese word associations from the Small World of Words Project.

Bing Li, Ziyi Ding, Simon De Deyne, Qing Cai

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bing Li *Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (MOE & STCSM), Affiliated Mental Health Center (ECNU), Institute of Brain and Education Innovation, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Ziyi Ding *Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (MOE & STCSM), Affiliated Mental Health Center (ECNU), Institute of Brain and Education Innovation, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Simon De Deyne *School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Qing CaiKey Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (MOE & STCSM), Affiliated Mental Health Center (ECNU), Institute of Brain and Education Innovation, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China. qcai@psy.ecnu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-8341-3833

Funding

Australian Research Council Early Career Grant DE140101749National Natural Science Foundation of China 31970987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Word associations are among the most direct ways to measure word meaning in human minds, capturing various relationships, even those formed by non-linguistic experiences. Although large-scale word associations exist for Dutch, English, and Spanish, there is a lack of data for Mandarin Chinese, the most widely spoken language from a distinct language family. Here we present the Small World of Words-Zhongwen (Chinese) (SWOW-ZH), a word association dataset of Mandarin Chinese derived from a three-response word association task. This dataset covers responses for over 10,000 cue words from more than 40,000 participants. We constructed a semantic network based on this dataset and evaluated concurrent validity of association-based measures by predicting human processing latencies and comparing them with text-based measures and word embeddings. Our results show that word centrality significantly predicts lexical decision and word naming speed. Furthermore, SWOW-ZH notably outperforms text-based embeddings and transformer-based large language models in predicting human-rated word relationships across varying sample sizes. We also highlight the unique characteristics of Chinese word associations, particularly focusing on word formation. Combined, our findings underscore the critical importance of large-scale human experimental data and its unique contribution to understanding the complexity and richness of language.

Indexed as

LanguageSemanticsAdultChinaDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMalePsycholinguisticsReaction TimeVocabularyYoung AdultChineseMental lexiconSemantic networkWord association

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.