Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39739121›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2024

Deciphering brain activation during wrist movements: comparative fMRI and fNIRS analysis of active, passive, and imagery states.

Maziar Jalalvandi, Hamid Sharini, Lida Shafaghi, Nader Riyahi Alam

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maziar JalalvandiDepartment of Neuroscience and Addiction Studies, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hamid ShariniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Lida ShafaghiDepartment of Neuroscience and Addiction Studies, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Nader Riyahi AlamMedical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran. riahialam@gmail.com.

Funding

Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services IR.TUMS.MEDICINE.REC.1396.3968
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the complex activation patterns of brain regions during motor tasks is crucial. Integrated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) offers advanced insights into how brain activity fluctuates with motor activities. This study explores neuronal activation patterns in the cerebral cortex during active, passive, and imagined wrist movements using these functional imaging techniques. Data were collected from 10 right-handed volunteers performing a motor task using fMRI and fNIRS. fMRI utilized a 3T scanner and a 20-channel head coil, while fNIRS recorded data with a 48-channel device at 765 nm and 855 nm. Analysis focused on key motor and sensory cortices using NIRS-SPM and SPM12, applying a significance threshold of p < 0.05 and a minimum cluster size of 10 voxels for group analysis. Super-threshold voxels were identified with FWE thresholding in SPM12. For activation map extraction we focused on the primary motor cortex, primary somatosensory cortex, somatosensory association cortex, premotor cortex, and supplementary motor cortex. Both fMRI and fNIRS detected activation in the primary motor cortex (M1). The primary somatosensory cortex was found to influence movement direction coding, with smaller activation sizes for upward movements. Combining fNIRS with fMRI provided clearer differentiation of brain activation patterns for wrist movements in various directions and conditions (p < 0.05). This study highlights variations in left motor cortex activity across different movement states. fNIRS proved effective in detecting brain function and showed strong correlation with fMRI results, suggesting it as a viable alternative for those unable to undergo fMRI.

Indexed as

Brain MappingImaginationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMovementSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredWristAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultCortical activationfMRIfNIRSMultimodal neuroimagingWrist movement

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.