Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39739101›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2024

Switching escape strategies in the parasitic ant cricket Myrmecophilus tetramorii.

Ryoya Tanaka, Yuki Mitaka, Daigo Takemoto, Mitsuhiko P Sato, Azusa Kamikouchi, Yoshinori Suzuki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ryoya TanakaGraduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8602, Japan. tanaka.ryoya.z3@f.mail.nagoya-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-6047-6030
Yuki MitakaGraduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8602, Japan.
Daigo TakemotoGraduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8602, Japan.
Mitsuhiko P SatoKazusa DNA Research Institute, Kisarazu, Chiba, 292-0818, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5383-5499
Azusa KamikouchiGraduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8602, Japan.
Yoshinori SuzukiTokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, 156-8506, Japan. suzuki-ys@phar.nagoya-cu.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-4179-6167

Funding

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) JP21K15137Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) JP22H05650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social parasites employ diverse strategies to deceive and infiltrate their hosts in order to benefit from stable resources. Although escape behaviours are considered an important part of these multipronged strategies, little is known about the repertoire of potential escape behaviours and how they facilitate integration into the host colony. Here, we investigated the escape strategies of the parasitic ant cricket Myrmecophilus tetramorii Ichikawa (Orthoptera: Myrmecophilidae) toward its host and non-host ant workers. We identified two escape strategies with distinct trajectory characteristics by clustering analysis; distancing (defined by high-speed straight movement away from ants for emergency avoidance) and dodging (circular escape movement to get behind ants under low-threat conditions). Interestingly, dodging is dominantly elicited over distancing for host species. Furthermore, our simulations proposed that dodging contributes to efficient foraging while avoiding ants. These results demonstrate that switching to a host-adapted escape strategy facilitates integration of this parasitic cricket into ant nests.

Indexed as

AntsEscape ReactionGryllidaeAnimalsHost-Parasite Interactions

Identifiers

PMID39739101
PMCPMC11686385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.