ArticleMaxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery2024
Establishment of an oral burn model in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.
Article in Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOral ulcers are painful mucosal lesions prone to infection and inflammation. To evaluate the effectiveness of treatments, a suitable experimental animal model with an appropriate healing period is required. The aim of this study was to develop an animal model for oral ulcer research by comparing oral burn wounds of different sizes and locations in diabetic rats.
methodsForty-four male Sprague-Dawley rats with induced diabetes were divided into six groups based on burn wound location and size: T5 (n = 10, tongue 5 mm), T3 (n = 10, tongue 3 mm), P5 (n = 10, palate 5 mm), P3 (n = 10, palate 3 mm), CT (n = 2, control tongue), and CP (n = 2, control palate). The burn wounds were induced by applying a heated device (100-120 °C) for 3 s. At 1- and 2-weeks post-surgery, macroscopic examination, histological staining, immunohistochemistry, and Western blot analysis were performed to compare the healing progress.
resultsHealing progressed more rapidly in the second week than in the first for all groups, with burns on the tongue (Groups T5 and T3) showing more advanced healing compared to burns on the palate (Groups P5 and P3). By the second week, Group T3 was almost completely healed, while Group T5 had some remaining wounds. In contrast, Groups P5 and P3 showed minimal healing. This faster healing on the tongue was further supported by significantly lower expression levels of TNF-α and IL-1β and a reduction in ulcer size, particularly on the tongue compared to the palate.
conclusionA 3 mm or 5 mm burn wound on the tongue of diabetic rats can serve as a useful animal model for evaluating new treatments for wound healing, particularly up to the first week. However, for studies extending to the second week, the 5 mm burn wound model on the tongue might be more advantageous.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.