ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2024
Ethical issues in fetal therapies of life-threatening malformations.
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prenatal Management of Spinal Muscular Atrophy in the Era of Genetic Screening and Emerging Opportunities in In Utero Therapy.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Intra- and extra-uterine diagnosis and treatment of peripartum imperforate hymen: a case report.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unlike any other medical field, fetal medicine addresses two patients: the fetus and the mother. Its primary goal is to improve neonatal outcomes, specifically by reducing mortality and morbidity, including long-term impacts, while minimizing risks to the mother. The aim of fetal interventions for life-threatening malformations is to decrease morbidity and mortality by mitigating the impact of the malformation on fetal growth and development. Although some randomized controlled trials have evaluated fetal medicine procedures, they have faced challenges such as the rarity of most conditions and ethical concerns related to clinical equipoise. Prematurity, an intrinsic risk of membrane puncture, remains a significant burden of fetal surgery, and maternal safety must always be prioritized when considering such procedures. Despite 50 years of research in fetal medicine, many questions remain, due to advancements in ultrasound technology and genetics, the inherent risks associated with fetal procedures, the lack of appropriate medical device for rare diseases and the cost associated with conditions that require complex multidisciplinary neonatal care. Justice and parental autonomy must be respected but the principle of non-maleficence should prevail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39739057What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.