ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Separating dementia with Lewy bodies from Alzheimer's disease dementia using a volumetric MRI classifier.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning for FDG-PET classification in patients with Alzheimer's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies and their mixed pathology: a solution for diagnostic heterogeneity.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Distinct brain volume changes associated with the head-turning sign and Neucop-Q response patterns in Alzheimer's disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesDistinguishing dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) from Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia, particularly in patients with DLB and concomitant AD pathology (DLB/AD+), can be challenging and there is no specific MRI signature for DLB. The aim of this study is to examine the additional value of MRI-based brain volumetry in separating patients with DLB (AD+/-) from patients with AD and controls.
methodsWe included 1518 participants from four cohorts (ADC, ADNI, PDBP and PredictND); 147 were patients with DLB (n = 76, DLB/AD+; n = 71, DLB/AD-), 668 patients with AD dementia, and 703 controls. We used an automatic segmentation tool to compute volumes of 70 brain regions, for which age, sex, and head size-dependent z-scores were calculated. We compared individual regions between the diagnostic groups and evaluated whether combining multiple regions improves differentiation. To assess the diagnostic performance, we used the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and sensitivity.
resultsThe classifier using the combination of 70 volumetric brain regions correctly classified 60% of patients with DLB and 70% of patients with AD dementia. For DLB vs. AD, the classifier produced an AUC of 0.80 (0.77-0.83), which outperformed the best individual region, hippocampus (AUC: 0.73 [0.69-0.76], p < 0.01). For the comparison of DLB/AD+ vs. AD, the classifier increased the AUC to 0.74 (0.68-0.80), which was 0.70 (0.64-0.76) for the hippocampus, p = 0.25.
conclusionUsing a combination of volumetric brain regions improved the classification accuracy, and thus the discrimination, of patients with DLB with and without concomitant AD pathology and AD. KEY POINTS: Question No specific MRI signature for dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) exists, making the differential diagnosis challenging, especially with dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Findings Volumes of individual brain regions defined by automatic MRI segmentation differed between DLB and AD patients and controls. Clinical relevance Automatic MRI segmentation can contribute to improving the discrimination of patients with DLB and AD, especially in non-specialized memory clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39739040What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.