Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39739034›Full record

SynthesisNeuroradiology2025

Efficacy and safety of tirofiban in acute ischemic stroke due to intracranial atherosclerotic disease for patients undergoing endovascular treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Luiz Fábio Silva Ribeiro, Lucas Rezende de Freitas, Ofonime Chantal Udoma-Udofa, Júlia Dos Santos Monteiro, Yasmin Picanço Silva, Walter Fagundes

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. ADJUVANT Randomized Controlled Trial: Rationale and Design.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luiz Fábio Silva RibeiroFederal University of São João del-Rei, Chanadour, Divinópolis, Brazil. luizfabioribeiro415@gmail.com.
Lucas Rezende de FreitasFederal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Ofonime Chantal Udoma-UdofaFederal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Júlia Dos Santos MonteiroUniversity of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Yasmin Picanço SilvaUniversity of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Walter FagundesFederal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTirofiban has emerged as an adjunct therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT). However, its benefits for AIS patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) remains unclear. This meta-analysis evaluates its efficacy and safety in ICAD-related AIS patients undergoing EVT.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase up to September, 2024, for studies comparing tirofiban to placebo or no intervention in ICAD-related AIS. Primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included 90-day mRS 0-1, mRS score at 90 days, successful reperfusion, 90-day mortality, postprocedural reocclusion, and symptomatic/non-symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Subgroup analyses evaluated tirofiban administration routes (intravenous, intra-arterial, or combined).

resultsThirteen studies comprising 3,572 patients were included. Intravenous tirofiban significantly increased mRS 0-2 (RR 1.26 [95% CI 1.13; 1.42]; p < 0.0001, I²= 0%), mRS 0-1(RR 1.24 [95% CI 1.05; 1.45]; p = 0.0098, I² = 0%), reduced mRS score by 0.58 points ([95% CI -0.99; -0.17]; p = 0.006, I²= 66%) and decreased mortality (RR 0.68 [95% CI 0.57; 0.80]; p < 0.0001, I²= 8%) at 90 days compared to control. Tirofiban overall reduced postprocedural reocclusion relative to control (RR 0.36 [95% CI 0.14; 0.94]; p = 0.036, I²= 73%). No significant differences were observed in successful reperfusion or ICH.

conclusionIntravenous tirofiban demonstrated an efficacy and safety profile, improving functional recovery and reducing mortality. Tirofiban overall reduced postprocedural reocclusion compared to control. No significant differences were found between groups in successful reperfusion or ICH. These findings support tirofiban as a safe and effective EVT adjunct. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO (CRD42024606522).

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresFibrinolytic AgentsIntracranial ArteriosclerosisIschemic StrokePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTirofibanHumansTreatment OutcomeFibrinolytic AgentsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTirofibanAcute ischemic strokeIntracranial atherosclerotic diseaseMeta-analysisTirofiban

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.