Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39739018›Full record

ArticleArchives of environmental contamination and toxicology2025

Evaluating the sensitivity of a chronic plant bioassay relative to an independently derived predicted no-effect thresholds to support risk assessment of very hydrophobic organic chemicals.

Aaron D Redman, Miriam Leon Paumen, Daniel J Letinski, Barbara A Kelley, Cary Sutherland, Bryan M Hedgpeth, Josh D Butler, Roger Prince, Gail E Bragin, Abraham J Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aaron D RedmanExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc., 1545 US Highway 22 East, Annandale, NJ, 08801-3059, USA. aaron.d.redman@exxonmobil.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5933-7906
Miriam Leon PaumenExxonMobil Petroleum and Chemical, Inc., Hermeslaan 2, 1831, Machelen, Belgium.
Daniel J LetinskiExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc., 1545 US Highway 22 East, Annandale, NJ, 08801-3059, USA.
Barbara A KelleyExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc., 1545 US Highway 22 East, Annandale, NJ, 08801-3059, USA.
Cary SutherlandExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc., 1545 US Highway 22 East, Annandale, NJ, 08801-3059, USA.
Bryan M HedgpethExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc., 1545 US Highway 22 East, Annandale, NJ, 08801-3059, USA.
Josh D ButlerExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc., 1545 US Highway 22 East, Annandale, NJ, 08801-3059, USA.
Roger PrinceStonybrook Apiary, Pittstown, NJ, 08867, USA.
Gail E BraginExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc., 1545 US Highway 22 East, Annandale, NJ, 08801-3059, USA.
Abraham J SmithExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc., 1545 US Highway 22 East, Annandale, NJ, 08801-3059, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental risk assessments of very hydrophobic organic compounds (VHOCs) in soils are often difficult because multiple processes (e.g., sorption, volatilization, biodegradation) can complicate the interpretation of results. A standardized soil dosing and aging procedure is presented for assessing bioavailability of VHOCs in a synthetic soil, which was used to evaluate the phytotoxicity of VHOCs. The soil preparation protocol resulted in relatively stable freely dissolved concentrations of test substance compared to bulk soil concentrations with some losses likely due to volatility and biodegradation. This dosing method was used in a chronic terrestrial plant toxicity bioassay to evaluate the potential toxicity of VHOCs on complex reproductive endpoints like inflorescence and seed bud formation. Testing included representative hydrocarbons and three very hydrophobic lubricant substances (logKow > 10). The toxicity data were used to evaluate existing predicted no-effect concentrations (PNECs) that had originally been derived with the target lipid model, which did not have these higher order chronic plant endpoints. The initial exposure concentrations were set at the PNECs to provide an independent validation of the PNEC. This evaluation was performed to expand the domain of applicability of the PNEC to VHOCs and for the chronic terrestrial plant endpoints. No effects were observed on plant biomass or inflorescence production at these low exposure concentrations, demonstrating that the established PNEC is protective of long-term plant health. The results of the present study confirm that the new dosing method is fit for purpose, and that the existing PNEC framework can be extended to chronic plant endpoints for VHOCs.

Indexed as

Biological AssayOrganic ChemicalsPlantsSoil PollutantsHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsRisk AssessmentSoilToxicity TestsOrganic ChemicalsSoilSoil Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID39739018
PMCPMC11783378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.