Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39739012›Full record

SynthesisNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2025

Relative effectiveness of antidepressant treatments in treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Johan Saelens, Anna Gramser, Victoria Watzal, Carlos A Zarate, Rupert Lanzenberger, Christoph Kraus

Abstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. CSF galanin and noradrenaline downregulation by psilocybin therapy in major depressive disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Trial
  7. Trajectory of response to esketamine nasal spray for treatment resistant depression: Findings from ESCAPE-TRD.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Comparing apples and oranges in TRD treatment: the importance of assumptions in network meta-analysis.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Innovative pharmacological depression treatment.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  20. Doxycycline: An essential tool for Alzheimer's disease.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Johan SaelensDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5556-1808
Anna GramserDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Victoria WatzalDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7252-7130
Carlos A ZarateExperimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4442-7412
Rupert LanzenbergerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4641-9539
Christoph KrausDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. christoph.kraus@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7144-2282

Funding

Glutamatergic Modulators for Rapid & Sustained Antidepressant EffectZIAMH002857 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI ZARATE, CARLOS · 2009 to 2025
$55.0M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002857U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) ZIAMH002857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) sought to compare different antidepressant treatments for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in order to facilitate evidence-based choices. A literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase from inception until April 13th, 2023 identified randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of adults with depression who had not responded to at least two antidepressant trials; all RCTs had ≥10 participants per study arm, and participants with bipolar or psychotic depression were excluded. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool-2 was used to assess study quality. Response rate was the primary outcome measure. Odds ratios (ORs) using a random effects NMA are reported. From 8234 records, 69 RCTs were included in this analysis, encompassing 10,285 participants (5662 F/4623 M) and 25 separate treatments. Six of the 25 treatments demonstrated a higher response rate versus placebo or sham treatment: electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), minocycline, theta-burst stimulation (TBS), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), ketamine, and aripiprazole. ORs ranged from 1.9 (95%CI = [1.25; 2.91]) for aripiprazole to 12.86 (95%CI = [4.07; 40.63]) for ECT. Moderate heterogeneity of the model was observed (I

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHumansTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID39739012
PMCPMC12032262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.