Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738935›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical systems2024

Evaluating of BERT-based and Large Language Mod for Suicide Detection, Prevention, and Risk Assessment: A Systematic Review.

Inbar Levkovich, Mahmud Omar

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Inbar LevkovichTel-Hai Academic College, 2208, Qiryat Shemona, Upper Galilee, Israel. levkovinb@telhai.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1582-3889
Mahmud OmarFaculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suicide constitutes a public health issue of major concern. Ongoing progress in the field of artificial intelligence, particularly in the domain of large language models, has played a significant role in the detection, risk assessment, and prevention of suicide. The purpose of this review was to explore the use of LLM tools in various aspects of suicide prevention. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, APA PsycNet, Cochrane Library, and IEEE Xplore-for studies published were systematically searched for articles published between January 1, 2018, until April 2024. The 29 reviewed studies utilized LLMs such as GPT, Llama, and BERT. We categorized the studies into three main tasks: detecting suicidal ideation or behaviors, assessing the risk of suicidal ideation, and preventing suicide by predicting attempts. Most of the studies demonstrated that these models are highly efficient, often outperforming mental health professionals in early detection and prediction capabilities. Large language models demonstrate significant potential for identifying and detecting suicidal behaviors and for saving lives. Nevertheless, ethical problems still need to be examined and cooperation with skilled professionals is essential.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceSuicidal IdeationSuicide PreventionHumansRisk AssessmentSuicideArtificial IntelligenceLarge Language ModelsSuicideSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID39738935
PMCPMC11685247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.