ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2024
Superficial palmar branch of radial artery flap for digital skin reconstruction: anatomical study and clinical applications.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigates the anatomy of the superficial palmar branch of the radial artery (SUPBRA) for palmar skin reconstruction. It aims to detail SUPBRA's anatomical features for hand/finger reconstruction and pinpoint reference points for efficient harvesting. MATERIALS AND
methodsNineteen male hand specimens (aged 18-70 years), fixed in 10% formalin, were dissected to study the anatomy of SUPBRA island flap. All measurements such as the external diameter of the SUPBRA, its bifurcation point from the radial artery, length of the SUPBRA pedicle, accompanied by venae comitantes, the number and location of perforators were used analyzed. Two flap techniques based on SUPBRA, the mid-palmar axis and wrist line axis, were studied. SUPBRA flap designs were used in three hand injury cases.
resultsThe distance from SUPBRA's origin to the styloid process averaged 9.4 ± 1.1 mm, and its mean diameter was 2.4 ± 1.5 mm. It has not been encountered a pattern with a narrow diameter of 1.1 mm or less, which is considered hypoplastic and unsuitable for a flap due to inadequate nourishment, in SUPBRA. Mean length of the SUPBRA pedicle was 31.0 ± 6.3 mm. The SUPBRA was typically accompanied by two vena comitantes. The location of the musculocutaneous perforators, approximately 10 mm distal to the scaphoid tubercle, suggests that when the SUPBRA flap is designed transversely along the distal wrist crease, the direct cutaneous perforators will play a crucial role in providing adequate blood supply to the flap as a pedicle. Flap sizes ranged from 1.5 × 3.0 mm to 2.5 × 6.5 mm. To obtain a longer pedicle, the flap was designed with a long-skin pattern along the long-axis direction, and the accompanying veins were dissected proximally to the radial artery. All cases confirmed the SUPBRA flap's viability for microvascular anastomosis in the thenar regions.
conclusionSUPBRA flap isa valuable option for hand and finger reconstruction,. providing detailed anatomical insights, including its external diameter, bifurcation point from the radial artery, flap length, presence of venae comitantes, and the number and locations of perforators. This flap is particularly suitable for reconstructing palmar defects of the radial digits, palm, and first webspace, and its arterial dimensions and lengths make it well-suited for microvascular anastomosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39738885What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.