Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738814›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Crocodile optimization algorithm for solving real-world optimization problems.

Fu Yan, Jin Zhang, Jianqiang Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fu YanGuizhou Big Data Academy, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China. fyan3@gzu.edu.cn.
Jin ZhangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.
Jianqiang YangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.

Funding

Foundation of Guizhou Provincial Basic Research Program(Natural Science) qiankehejichu-[2024]qingnian109Guizhou Educational Committee qianjiaoji[2022]103haoGuizhou University guidajichu [2023] 17haoGuizhou University guidarenjihezi(2021) 61haoNational Natural Science Foundation of China 62466010National Natural Science Foundation of China 72261005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nature-inspired bionic algorithms have become one of the most fascinating techniques in computational intelligence research, and have shown great potential in real-world challenging problems for their simplicity and flexibility. This paper proposes a novel nature-inspired algorithm, called the crocodile optimization algorithm (COA), which mimics the hunting strategies of crocodiles. In COA, the hunting behavior of crocodiles includes premeditation and waiting hunting. The premeditation behavior is an important hunting way for crocodiles to hide themselves from their prey and to explore more potential areas, and the waiting hunting behavior is another means by which crocodiles make surprise attacks on their prey that appears in their hunting range. The performance of the proposed COA is validated by comparing it with other competitor algorithms on 29 standard test functions and 5 real-world engineering optimization problems. The experimental results show that the comprehensive performance of COA outperforms both of its similar variants and most of other state-of-the-art algorithms, in terms of solution accuracy, robustness and convergence speed. Statistical tests also validate the potential applications of the proposed algorithm.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAlligators and CrocodilesAnimalsPredatory BehaviorCrocodile optimization algorithm (COA)Global optimizationMetaheuristicsSwarm intelligence

Identifiers

PMID39738814
PMCPMC11686008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.