ArticleBehavior research methods2024
Assessing handwriting skills in a web browser: Development and validation of an automated online test in Japanese Kanji.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An introduction to the Item Response Warehouse (IRW): A resource for enhancing data usage in psychometrics.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Online language and literacy assessments have become prevalent in research and practice across settings. However, a notable exception is the assessment of handwriting and spelling, which has traditionally been conducted in person with paper and pencil. In light of this, we developed an automated, browser-based handwriting test application (Online Assessment of Handwriting and Spelling: OAHaS) for Japanese Kanji (Study 1) and examined its psychometric properties (Study 2). The automated scoring function using convolutional neural network (CNN) models achieved high recall (98.7%) and specificity (84.4%), as well as high agreement with manual scoring (95.4%). Additionally, behavioral validation with data from primary school children (N = 261, 49.0% female, age range = 6-12 years) indicated the high reliability and validity of our online test application, with a strong correlation between children's scores on the online and paper-based tests (r = .86). Moreover, our analysis indicated the potential utility of writing fluency measures (latency and duration) that are automatically recorded by OAHaS. Taken together, our browser-based application demonstrated the feasibility and viability of remote and automated assessment of handwriting skills, providing a streamlined approach to research and practice on handwriting. The source code of the application and supporting materials are available on Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/gver2/ ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.