Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738795›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2025

A machine learning approach identifies cellular senescence on transcriptome data of human cells in vitro.

Shamsed Mahmud, Chen Zheng, Fernando E Santiago, Lei Zhang, Paul D Robbins, Xiao Dong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shamsed MahmudInstitute on the Biology of Aging and Metabolism, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Chen ZhengInstitute on the Biology of Aging and Metabolism, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Fernando E SantiagoInstitute on the Biology of Aging and Metabolism, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Lei ZhangInstitute on the Biology of Aging and Metabolism, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Paul D RobbinsInstitute on the Biology of Aging and Metabolism, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Xiao DongInstitute on the Biology of Aging and Metabolism, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. dong0265@umn.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9987-5760

Funding

Targeting Cellular Senescence to Extend HealthspanP01AG062413 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sundeep Khosla, Nathan K LeBrasseur · 2019 to 2026
$28.7M
Validation and characterization of the identified variants associated with human longevity in mouse modelsU19AG056278 · NIA · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI NIR J BARZILAI, Paul D. Robbins · 2017 to 2026
$24.5M
Project 3 - Role of Proline Metabolism in Regulation of Mammalian Cardiomyocyte ProliferationP01HL160476 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Hesham Sadek · 2022 to 2026
$13.1M
Midwest Murine-Tissue Mapping Center (MM-TMC)U54AG079754 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI GR Scott Budinger, Sundeep Khosla · 2022 to 2026
$11.5M
The role of senescent cells in dysregulating immune responses and pathogen controlP01AI172501 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI STEPHEN C JAMESON · 2024 to 2026
$10.9M
Minnesota Tissue Mapping Center for Senescent CellsU54AG076041 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Constantin F. Aliferis, LAURA Jane NIEDERNHOFER · 2021 to 2026
$10.5M
Training Grant: Functional Proteomics of AgingT32AG029796 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI EDGAR A ARRIAGA, Douglas G Mashek · 2008 to 2026
$6.6M
Computational evaluation of the causal role of somatic mutations in human agingR00AG056656 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI DONG, XIAO · 2021 to 2023
$747k
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL160476NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI172501NIA NIH HHS P01 AG062413NIA NIH HHS R00 AG056656NIA NIH HHS T32 AG029796NIA NIH HHS U19 AG056278NIA NIH HHS U54 AG076041NIA NIH HHS U54 AG079754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although cellular senescence has been recognized as a hallmark of aging, it is challenging to detect senescence cells (SnCs) due to their high level of heterogeneity at the molecular level. Machine learning (ML) is likely an ideal approach to address this challenge because of its ability to recognize complex patterns that cannot be characterized by one or a few features, from high-dimensional data. To test this, we evaluated the performance of four ML algorithms including support vector machines (SVM), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), and Soft Independent Modelling of Class Analogy (SIMCA), in distinguishing SnCs from controls based on bulk RNA sequencing data. The dataset includes 162 in vitro samples, covering three human cell types: fibroblasts, melanocytes, and keratinocytes, and three senescence inducers: irradiation, bleomycin treatment, and replication. Under tenfold and leave-one-out cross-validation, as well as independent dataset validation, all methods provided ~ 80% or higher accuracy, with SVM reaching over 99%. Similar accuracy was achieved using expert-curated gene lists, e.g., SenMayo and CellAge, instead of our algorithm-prioritized gene list using minimum redundancy-maximum relevance (mRMR). However, only a few genes overlapped between the gene sets, suggesting a wide impact of senescence on the transcriptome. Overall, our study demonstrated a proof-of-concept for identifying senescence using ML.

Indexed as

Cellular SenescenceMachine LearningTranscriptomeAlgorithmsFibroblastsGene Expression ProfilingHumansKeratinocytesMelanocytesSupport Vector MachineCellular senescenceMachine learningRNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39738795
PMCPMC12181610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.