ArticleGeroScience2025
A machine learning approach identifies cellular senescence on transcriptome data of human cells in vitro.
Article in GeroScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of senescence in kidney ageing, injury and fibrosis.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026Review
- Article
- A transcriptomic analysis reveals shared and inducer-specific expression patterns of cellular senescence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Senescence-associated gene pathways are differentially expressed in equine aging-related osteoarthritis.American journal of veterinary research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although cellular senescence has been recognized as a hallmark of aging, it is challenging to detect senescence cells (SnCs) due to their high level of heterogeneity at the molecular level. Machine learning (ML) is likely an ideal approach to address this challenge because of its ability to recognize complex patterns that cannot be characterized by one or a few features, from high-dimensional data. To test this, we evaluated the performance of four ML algorithms including support vector machines (SVM), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), and Soft Independent Modelling of Class Analogy (SIMCA), in distinguishing SnCs from controls based on bulk RNA sequencing data. The dataset includes 162 in vitro samples, covering three human cell types: fibroblasts, melanocytes, and keratinocytes, and three senescence inducers: irradiation, bleomycin treatment, and replication. Under tenfold and leave-one-out cross-validation, as well as independent dataset validation, all methods provided ~ 80% or higher accuracy, with SVM reaching over 99%. Similar accuracy was achieved using expert-curated gene lists, e.g., SenMayo and CellAge, instead of our algorithm-prioritized gene list using minimum redundancy-maximum relevance (mRMR). However, only a few genes overlapped between the gene sets, suggesting a wide impact of senescence on the transcriptome. Overall, our study demonstrated a proof-of-concept for identifying senescence using ML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.