ArticleScientific reports2024
Advanced generative adversarial network for optimizing layout of wireless sensor networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolutionary reinforcement learning framework for energy-efficient fault resilience and topological stability in WSNs.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Enhancing the effectiveness of wireless sensor networks through consensus estimation and universal coverage.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Coverage and connectivity maximization for wireless sensor networks using improved chaotic grey wolf optimization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The best layout design related to the sensor node distribution represents one among the major research questions in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs). It has a direct impact on WSNs' cost, detection capabilities, and monitoring quality. The optimization of several conflicting objectives, including as load balancing, coverage, cost, lifetime, connection, and energy consumption of sensor nodes, is necessary for layout optimization. Layout optimization represents an NP-hard combinatorial issue. A number of meta-heuristic optimization strategies have been put out to address this issue in the past ten years. Nevertheless, these methods only addressed a subset of the objectives-combinations of energy consumption, count of sensor nodes, area coverage, and lifetime-or they offered computationally costly solutions. Therefore, this research paper presents a layout optimization problem using novel intelligent deep learning-based optimization methodology. Here, the major objective is to cover numerous objectives associated with optimal layouts of homogeneous WSNs that involves connectivity, coverage, energy consumption, lifetime, and the number of sensor nodes. The layout optimization problem is handled by the novel Advanced Generative Adversarial Network (AGAN), where the parameter tuning is performed by the nature inspired optimization algorithm called Piranha Foraging Optimization Algorithm (PFOA), with the consideration of deriving the objective function. Simulation findings revealed that the proposed novel AGAN-PFOA generated optimal Pareto front of non-dominated solutions having better hyper-volumes as well as spread of solutions than the state-of-the-art solutions. The proposed AGAN-PFOA for the WSN layout optimization problem in terms of PDR, coverage, energy consumption, lifetime, alive node count, delay, and routing overhead is 61.46%, 15.12%, 12.67%, 65.91%, 70.59%, 44.88%, and 68.86% better than the existing methods respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.