Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738794›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Advanced generative adversarial network for optimizing layout of wireless sensor networks.

S Praveen Kumar, Setu Garg, Eatedal Alabdulkreem, Achraf Ben Miled

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S Praveen KumarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, E.G.S. Pillay Engineering College, Nagapattinam, Tamil Nadu, 611002, India. asv.praveen@gmail.com.
Setu GargDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, ITS Engineering College, Gr. Noida, India.
Eatedal AlabdulkreemDepartment of Computer Sciences, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, 11671, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Achraf Ben MiledDepartment of Computer Science, College of Science, Northern Border University, 73213, Arar, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The best layout design related to the sensor node distribution represents one among the major research questions in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs). It has a direct impact on WSNs' cost, detection capabilities, and monitoring quality. The optimization of several conflicting objectives, including as load balancing, coverage, cost, lifetime, connection, and energy consumption of sensor nodes, is necessary for layout optimization. Layout optimization represents an NP-hard combinatorial issue. A number of meta-heuristic optimization strategies have been put out to address this issue in the past ten years. Nevertheless, these methods only addressed a subset of the objectives-combinations of energy consumption, count of sensor nodes, area coverage, and lifetime-or they offered computationally costly solutions. Therefore, this research paper presents a layout optimization problem using novel intelligent deep learning-based optimization methodology. Here, the major objective is to cover numerous objectives associated with optimal layouts of homogeneous WSNs that involves connectivity, coverage, energy consumption, lifetime, and the number of sensor nodes. The layout optimization problem is handled by the novel Advanced Generative Adversarial Network (AGAN), where the parameter tuning is performed by the nature inspired optimization algorithm called Piranha Foraging Optimization Algorithm (PFOA), with the consideration of deriving the objective function. Simulation findings revealed that the proposed novel AGAN-PFOA generated optimal Pareto front of non-dominated solutions having better hyper-volumes as well as spread of solutions than the state-of-the-art solutions. The proposed AGAN-PFOA for the WSN layout optimization problem in terms of PDR, coverage, energy consumption, lifetime, alive node count, delay, and routing overhead is 61.46%, 15.12%, 12.67%, 65.91%, 70.59%, 44.88%, and 68.86% better than the existing methods respectively.

Indexed as

Advanced generative adversarial networkLayout optimizationPiranha foraging optimization algorithmWireless sensor network

Identifiers

PMID39738794
PMCPMC11686309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.