ArticleScientific reports2024
Exploring the impact of fulvic acid and humic acid on heavy metal availability to alfalfa in molybdenum contaminated soil.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mixing regimes shape microbial community composition, nutrient regimes, and plant growth attributes in Jeevamrit: metagenomics and culturomics-based insights.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Importance of Humic Acids in Shaping the Resistance of Soil Microorganisms and the Tolerance ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Housefly larva bioconversion enhances heavy metal stabilization and antibiotic degradation during chicken manure composting.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The combination of nitrogen fertilizers and EDDS enhances remediation efficiency of Bidens pilosa L. in Cd-contaminated soils.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Inducing hour-level humification of Enteromorpha prolifera to fabricate fulvic-like acid fertilizer with Fenton's reagent.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humic substances, such as Fulvic acid (FA) and humic acid (HA), are widely used for the remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils due to their ability to enhance metal mobility and facilitate plant uptake. In this study, we conducted a pot experiment with alfalfa to investigate the effects of FA and HA amendments on the mobility of molybdenum (Mo) in the soil, its uptake by alfalfa plants, and subsequent changes in the microbial community. The results demonstrated that both FA and HA influence Mo accumulation in the soil and plants. Specifically, HA treatment increased Mo concentrations in alfalfa shoots and roots by 1.08-1.19 times and 1.19-2.43 times, respectively, compared to the control. In contrast, FA enhanced Mo concentrations in alfalfa roots (1.05-1.58 times) but reduced Mo levels in the shoots (0.78-0.85 times). Furthermore, the addition of FA and HA altered the chemical speciation of Mo in the soil, promoting the conversion of reducible and oxidizable fraction to more exchangeable and residual fraction. As a result, the proportion of non-residual Mo fractions (exchangeable, reducible, and oxidizable) decreased from 87.48% to 80.30-87.35%, while residual fractions increased from 12.52% to 12.65-19.70%. Additionally, the structure of the soil bacterial community was primarily influenced by changes in soil properties such as cation exchange capacity, available phosphorus, and ammonium nitrogen levels. This finding highlight the potential of FA and HA to enhance Mo availability, uptake, and translocation in alfalfa, suggesting that their application could be an effective strategy for phytoremediation of Mo-contaminated soils, particularly when alfalfa is used as a hyperaccumulator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.