Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738754›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2024

Diabetes Care Disparities in Deaf/Hard of Hearing and Blind/Low Vision Populations.

Allyson S Hughes, Karissa Mirus, Nazanin M Heydarian, Michelle L Litchman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Allyson S HughesOhio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH, USA. ashughes@ohio.edu.
Karissa MirusCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, 10 South 2000 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Nazanin M HeydarianUniversity of Texas at Rio Grande Valley, Edinburgh, TX, USA.
Michelle L LitchmanCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, 10 South 2000 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. michelle.litchman@nurs.utah.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewDescribe the connection between Deaf/hard of hearing (DHH) and diabetes, explain the bidirectional relationship of blind/low vision (BLV) and diabetes, characterize challenges DHH and BLV populations face when seeking healthcare regarding their diabetes management. Highlight the inaccessibility of diabetes technology in these populations. Provide best practices when communicating with DHH and BLV people in the clinical setting. RECENT

findingsDiabetes disparities exist in DHH and BLV populations due to systemic barriers to health equity related to access and communication. Structural barriers, risk factors, social determinants of health, and the U.S. healthcare system do not support the DHH and BLV communities. Importantly, healthcare professionals do not receive adequate training on communication and treatment of DHH and BLV populations. Together, social determinants of health, such as healthcare access and quality, education access and quality, and lack of adequate clinician training allow ableism to persist and drive health disparities in these communities. Health disparities faced by DHH and BLV populations are driven by barriers to diabetes standards of care. These inequities must be rectified to improve and maintain high quality care.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesSocial Determinants of HealthUnited StatesVision, LowAccessibilityBlindDeafDiabetesHeard of hearingLow-visionSign language

Identifiers

PMID39738754
PMCPMC11683019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.