ArticlePituitary2024
Impact of insurance on outcomes of patients undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for non-functional pituitary adenomas: a single institution study.
Article in Pituitary, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeUninsured and underinsured patients face notable healthcare disparities in neurosurgery, but limited literature exists on the impact of insurance on non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs). We investigated how insurance affects outcomes of endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery (ETPS) for NFPAs.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed NFPA patients who underwent ETPS at our institution from 2012 to 2023. Patients were grouped by insurance status, and insured patients were further subcategorized by insurance providers. Bivariate analyses used Fisher's exact, chi-square, and t-tests. ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests were applied for ≥ 2 groups. Logistic regression identified relationships between binomial variables and insurance.
resultsOur cohort (n = 651, 56.93 ± 15.53 years, 52.53% male) included 611 insured and 40 uninsured patients. Uninsured patients had lower preoperative KPS, higher rates of visual disturbances (VD), preoperative tumor volumes (TV), chiasm compression, and Knosp 4 grade, along with lower resection and longer hospital stays (LOS) (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed lack of insurance was associated with increased VD (aOR 3.38), TV (aOR 2.63), Knosp 4 (aOR 3.44), subtotal resection (aOR 2.72), and prolonged LOS (aOR 7.03) (p < 0.05). When insured patients were grouped into Private (n = 361), Medicare (n = 223), and Medicaid (n = 23), Medicaid patients had larger preoperative TV, chiasm compression, Knosp 3 grade, and longer LOS (p < 0.05), with higher odds for Knosp 3 (aOR 3.00), subtotal resection (aOR 3.86), and prolonged LOS (aOR 8.38) (p < 0.05).
conclusionOur study highlights significant disparities in uninsured patients and those with Medicaid, underscoring the need for targeted interventions for these populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.