Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738738›Full record

ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2024

Robotic liver parenchymal transection techniques: a comprehensive overview and classification.

Marco Palucci, Fabio Giannone, Gabriela Del Angel-Millán, Mariantonietta Alagia, Celeste Del Basso, Marco Lodin, Igor Monsellato, Federico Sangiuolo, Gianluca Cassese, Fabrizio Panaro

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marco PalucciAzienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.
Fabio GiannoneAzienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy. fabio.giannone@ospedale.al.it.
Gabriela Del Angel-MillánAzienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.
Mariantonietta AlagiaAzienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.
Celeste Del BassoAzienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.
Marco LodinAzienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.
Igor MonsellatoAzienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.
Federico SangiuoloAzienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.
Gianluca CasseseAzienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.
Fabrizio PanaroAzienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic liver surgery is experiencing a period of great development, but some hurdles still need to be overcome. Parenchymal transection remains one of the most technically challenging steps. The lack of dedicated instruments and the flourishing of several techniques didn't allow surgeons to reach a standard technique so far. The aim of the present paper is to provide an overview of the different robotic liver transection techniques described to date, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each one. We conducted an extensive search on PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science, inserting the following keywords: "robotic liver transection, robotic hepatic transection" and focusing particularly on technical reports and paper regarding new surgical methods. This search resulted in a total of 13 different surgical techniques. All the methods described can be classified into two categories the "hybrid techniques" and the "fully robotic techniques" which are based, respectively, on the combined use of laparoscopic and robotic instrumentation or exclusively robotic devices. Another fundamental difference is the division between "one-surgeon" and "two-surgeon techniques", which depends on the level of expertise required of the assistant surgeon at the operating table. This is the first comprehensive review on this topic. Although the existing literature does not allow one technique to be established as superior to the others, the adoption of a standardized method of robotic hepatic transection is highly desirable to optimize surgical results and to allow better comparability of outcomes within the scientific community.

Indexed as

HepatectomyLaparoscopyLiverRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansLiver transectionRobotic hepatectomyRobotic liver surgeryRobotic parenchymal transectionTransection techniques

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.