Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738730›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Participatory management and sustainable ecosystem management indicators.

Saeed Maghsoodi, Seyedeh Khadijeh Mahdavi, Mohammadreza Shahraki, Mohsen Sharafatmandrad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saeed MaghsoodiDepartment of Natural Resource, Nour Branch, Islamic Azad University, Nour, Iran.
Seyedeh Khadijeh MahdaviDepartment of Natural Resource, Nour Branch, Islamic Azad University, Nour, Iran.
Mohammadreza ShahrakiResearcher of Rural Development and Social Issues in the Field of Natural Resources and Agriculture, Gorgan, Iran.
Mohsen SharafatmandradDepartment of Ecological Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Jiroft, 8th km of Jiroft - Bandar Abbas road, P.O. Box: 7867161167, Jiroft, Iran. mohsen.sharafatmandrad@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4890-1839

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The United Nations has implemented projects focusing on the participation of local communities in economic, social and ecological criteria in different countries. The present study aimed to assess the effects of such projects on sustainable ecosystem management indicators in the Tilabad watershed, Golestan province, Iran. The statistical population includes 99 pastoralists from 3 pastoral units, of which 80 pastoralists were selected as the sample size and sampled by stratified random sampling technique. The measurement tool was a researcher-made questionnaire. The results showed that 41.3% of the respondents (the highest frequency) evaluated the effectiveness of project as good. The implementation of the participatory project has had a positive and significant effect on the sustainable ecosystem management (β = 0.703 and t = 12.756). The greatest effectiveness is related to the social (β = 0.671 and t = 12.146) and economic (β = 0.644 and t = 8.615) criteria. Age, experience of animal husbandry (P ≤ 0.05), the number of animals, and the amount of income from animal husbandry (P ≤ 0.01) had a positive and significant relationship with the project effectiveness on sustainable ecosystem management in the area. It can be concluded that participatory approaches can lead to sustainable ecosystem management.

Indexed as

LivelihoodParticipationPastoralismRangelandSocial capital

Identifiers

PMID39738730
PMCPMC11686191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.