ArticleScientific reports2024
Sivan classification system for diagnosis of jaw lesions based on visual volumetric analysis of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cone-beam computed tomography-based radiomic analysis of architectural phenotypes in jaw cysts and tumors using interpretable artificial intelligence models.World journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A novel classification system, termed the Sivan classification, was developed to enhance the diagnosis of jaw lesions by utilizing visual volumetric analysis of three-dimensional Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images. This classification groups lesions into ten categories, primarily divided into hypovolumetric, hypervolumetric, and normovolumetric groups. To validate this system, 10 raters-comprising 5 general dentists and 5 oral radiology specialists-assessed the CBCT images and diagnosed the lesions using the Sivan classification. Eight raters repeated the process after one month to assess consistency. The overall agreement between raters, quantified using kappa statistics, was 0.82, indicating excellent consistency. Hypervolumetric and normovolumetric lesions demonstrated the highest agreement (kappa 0.84 and 0.82, respectively), while hypovolumetric lesions showed substantial agreement (kappa 0.77). Pairwise interrater agreement ranged from 76 to 93%, with kappa values between 0.75 and 0.87. Intrarater reliability was equally strong, with kappa values between 0.79 and 0.89.These results suggest that the Sivan classification provides a robust and reliable framework for diagnosing jaw lesions using CBCT volumetric analysis, surpassing traditional diagnostic methods in accuracy and consistency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.