ArticleScientific reports2024
Research on optimal selection of runoff prediction models based on coupled machine learning methods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Runoff fluctuations under the influence of climate change and human activities present a significant challenge and valuable application in constructing high-accuracy runoff prediction models. This study aims to address this challenge by taking the Wanzhou station in the Three Gorges Reservoir area as a case study to optimize various prediction models. The study first selects artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM) as the base models. Then, it evaluates and selects from three time-series decomposition methods. Time-Varying Filter-based Empirical Mode Decomposition (TVF-EMD), Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition with Adaptive Noise (CEEMDAN), and Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD). Subsequently, these decomposition methods are coupled with optimization algorithms, including Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (GOA), and Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA), to construct various hybrid prediction models. The results indicate that: (1) The single prediction model LSTM demonstrated higher prediction accuracy compared to BP and SVM; (2) The VMD-LSTM model outperformed the CEEMDAN-LSTM and TVF-EMD-LSTM models. Compared to the single LSTM model, the Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) and Pearson's correlation coefficient (R) of the VMD-LSTM model were improved by 15.06% and 6.82%, respectively; (3) Among the machine learning prediction models coupled with various methods, the VMD-SSA-LSTM model achieved the highest accuracy. Compared to the VMD-LSTM model, the NSE and R values of the VMD-SSA-LSTM model were further increased by 13.09% and 4.26%, respectively. Employing a "decomposition-reconstruction" strategy combined with robust optimization algorithms enhances the performance of machine learning prediction models, thereby significantly improving the runoff prediction capabilities in watershed hydrological models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.