Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738663›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Research on optimal selection of runoff prediction models based on coupled machine learning methods.

Xing Wei, Mengen Chen, Yulin Zhou, Jianhua Zou, Libo Ran, Ruibo Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xing WeiSchool of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Chongqing, 404100, China. weixing@sanxiau.edu.cn.
Mengen ChenSchool of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Chongqing, 404100, China.
Yulin ZhouSchool of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Chongqing, 404100, China.
Jianhua ZouSchool of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Chongqing, 404100, China.
Libo RanSchool of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Chongqing, 404100, China.
Ruibo ShiSchool of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Chongqing, 404100, China.

Funding

Chongqing Engineering Research Center of Disaster Prevention & Control for Banks and Structures in Three Gorges Reservoir Area SXAPGC23YB08The research was sponsored by the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing Municipality No.CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX1392The research was sponsored by the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing Municipality No.CSTB2023NSCQ-MSX0694the Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission KJQN202201210the Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission KJQN202201224the Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission KJQN202301209the Science Technology Planning Project of WanZhou District, Chongqing wzstc20230313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Runoff fluctuations under the influence of climate change and human activities present a significant challenge and valuable application in constructing high-accuracy runoff prediction models. This study aims to address this challenge by taking the Wanzhou station in the Three Gorges Reservoir area as a case study to optimize various prediction models. The study first selects artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM) as the base models. Then, it evaluates and selects from three time-series decomposition methods. Time-Varying Filter-based Empirical Mode Decomposition (TVF-EMD), Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition with Adaptive Noise (CEEMDAN), and Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD). Subsequently, these decomposition methods are coupled with optimization algorithms, including Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (GOA), and Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA), to construct various hybrid prediction models. The results indicate that: (1) The single prediction model LSTM demonstrated higher prediction accuracy compared to BP and SVM; (2) The VMD-LSTM model outperformed the CEEMDAN-LSTM and TVF-EMD-LSTM models. Compared to the single LSTM model, the Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) and Pearson's correlation coefficient (R) of the VMD-LSTM model were improved by 15.06% and 6.82%, respectively; (3) Among the machine learning prediction models coupled with various methods, the VMD-SSA-LSTM model achieved the highest accuracy. Compared to the VMD-LSTM model, the NSE and R values of the VMD-SSA-LSTM model were further increased by 13.09% and 4.26%, respectively. Employing a "decomposition-reconstruction" strategy combined with robust optimization algorithms enhances the performance of machine learning prediction models, thereby significantly improving the runoff prediction capabilities in watershed hydrological models.

Indexed as

Machine learningRunoff predictionSparrow search algorithmThree gorges reservoir areaVariational mode decomposition

Identifiers

PMID39738663
PMCPMC11685801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.