Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738658›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A dance movement quality evaluation model using transformer encoder and convolutional neural network.

Jiping Qu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jiping QuSchool of Literature, Law and Art, East China University of Technology, Nanchang, 330013, China. 201960218@ecut.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to put forward a new evaluation model of dance movement quality to deal with the subjectivity and inconsistency in traditional evaluation methods. In view of the complexity and diversity of dance art and the widespread popularity of dance videos on social media, it is particularly urgent to develop an automatic and efficient tool for evaluating the quality of dance movements. Therefore, this study puts forward the Transformer Convolutional Neural Network with Dynamic and Static Streams (TransCNN-DSSS) model, which combines the analysis of dynamic flow and static flow, and makes use of the advantages of Transformer and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to deeply analyze and evaluate the dance movements. The core of the model is Quality Score Decoupling (QSD), which decouples and weights different quality dimensions of dance movements through attention mechanism, such as accuracy, fluency and expressiveness. Score Prediction module (SPM) uses Transformer network to further process the fused features, and outputs the final evaluation score through the full connection layer. In the experimental part, the TransCNN-DSSS model is trained and tested on the marked dance movement dataset. The performance of the model is evaluated by accuracy, recall and F1 score. The results show that the model has achieved 90% accuracy, 89% recall and F1 score of 0.90 in the task of evaluating the quality of dance movements. These results prove the effectiveness and reliability of the model. In addition, the adaptability test of the model in different dance styles also shows good generalization ability. The research contribution of this study is to put forward a new evaluation model of dance movement quality, which provides an objective and automatic evaluation tool for dance teaching, competition scoring and fans.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural networkDance movement evaluationDynamic flowStatic flowTransCNN-DSSS modelTransformer

Identifiers

PMID39738658
PMCPMC11685562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.