ArticleScientific reports2024
Selective learning for sensing using shift-invariant spectrally stable undersampled networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The amount of data collected for sensing tasks in scientific computing is based on the Shannon-Nyquist sampling theorem proposed in the 1940s. Sensor data generation will surpass 73 trillion GB by 2025 as we increase the high-fidelity digitization of the physical world. Skyrocketing data infrastructure costs and time to maintain and compute on all this data are increasingly common. To address this, we introduce a selective learning approach, where the amount of data collected is problem dependent. We develop novel shift-invariant and spectrally stable neural networks to solve real-time sensing problems formulated as classification or regression problems. We demonstrate that (i) less data can be collected while preserving information, and (ii) test accuracy improves with data augmentation (size of training data), rather than by collecting more than a certain fraction of raw data, unlike information theoretic approaches. While sampling at Nyquist rates, every data point does not have to be resolved at Nyquist and the network learns the amount of data to be collected. This has significant implications (orders of magnitude reduction) on the amount of data collected, computation, power, time, bandwidth, and latency required for several embedded applications ranging from low earth orbit economy to unmanned underwater vehicles.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.