Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738637›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Impact of various additives and their combinations on the consolidation characteristics of clayey soil.

Soheila Shojamoghadam, Arash Rajaee, Saeed Abrishami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Soheila ShojamoghadamDepartment of Civil Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
Arash RajaeeDepartment of Civil Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
Saeed AbrishamiDepartment of Civil Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. s.abrishami@um.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving highway bases is the most crucial step that enhances pavements' performance and long-term durability. Lime and Portland cement are commonly used in soil stabilization endeavors. Nevertheless, the substantial carbon emissions associated with cement and lime manufacturing have led to a growing interest in researching environmentally friendly additives. Through standard proctor compaction tests and one-dimensional consolidation tests, this research investigates the consolidation behavior of fine-grained soil stabilized with various content of additives such as fly ash (FA), volcanic ash (VA), marble powder (MP), cement, and lime and their combination at different curing times (7, 14, 28, and 90 days). Furthermore, to evaluate the characteristics of materials, tests such as Atterberg limits, soil grain size distribution, X-ray fluorescence (XRF), scanning electron microscope (SEM), particle size analysis (PSA), and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) have been performed on the selected materials. Various stabilizing agents have different effects on consolidation and compaction behavior, with maximum dry density (MDD) decreasing with higher additives content and optimum moisture content (OMC) values generally increasing, except for MP-stabilized samples. The results indicate that the addition of FA, VA, MP, cement, and lime results in compressibility reductions. By raising the proportion of FA, VA, and MP additives to 20% and extending the duration of curing to 90 days, the compression index (C

Indexed as

Consolidation behaviorFine-grained soilsFly ash (FA)Marble powder (MP)Soil stabilizationVolcanic ash (VA)

Identifiers

PMID39738637
PMCPMC11686303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.