Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738623›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Petrological controls on the engineering properties of carbonate aggregates through a machine learning approach.

Javid Hussain, Tehseen Zafar, Xiaodong Fu, Nafees Ali, Jian Chen, Fabrizio Frontalini, Jabir Hussain, Xiao Lina, George Kontakiotis, Olga Koumoutsakou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Javid HussainState Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock, and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430071, China.
Tehseen ZafarGeosciences Department, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, 15551, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates. tehseenzafar@uaeu.ac.ae.
Xiaodong FuState Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock, and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430071, China.
Nafees AliState Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock, and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430071, China.
Jian ChenState Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock, and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430071, China. jchen@whrsm.ac.cn.
Fabrizio FrontaliniDipartimento di Scienze Pure e Applicate (DiSPeA), Università degli Studi di Urbino "Carlo Bo", 61029, Urbino, Italy.
Jabir HussainResearch School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Xiao LinaFaculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), 388 Lumo Avenue, 430074, Wuhan, China.
George KontakiotisDepartment of Historical Geology-Paleontology, Faculty of Geology and Geoenvironment, School of Earth Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15784, Panepistimiopolis, Zografou, Greece.
Olga KoumoutsakouDepartment of Historical Geology-Paleontology, Faculty of Geology and Geoenvironment, School of Earth Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15784, Panepistimiopolis, Zografou, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rock aggregates have been extensively exploited in the construction sector, and the associated engineering features play a critical role in their application. The main aim of this research is to assess the impact of petrographic characteristics on the engineering properties of carbonate rocks. A total of 45 carbonate rock samples from different geological formations within the Salt Range (Western Himalayan Ranges, Pakistan) were subjected to comprehensive petrographic analyses and standard aggregate quality control tests. The engineering characteristics encompassed Los Angeles abrasion value, aggregate crushing value, aggregate impact value, specific gravity, water absorption, and unconfined compressive strength, whereas petrographic examination of thin sections quantified the mineralogical composition. Statistical methods and machine learning models have been applied to elucidate the relationships between the petrographic and engineering features of the aggregates and establish potential predictive capability. The analysis identified clay, calcite, feldspar, and dolomite as the primary determinants for the engineering behavior of carbonate aggregates. Although multiple regression analyses produced R² values exceeding 0.84, the multiple regression equations did not provide substantial insights into the impact of all petrographic parameters on engineering properties. To enhance predictive accuracy, advanced machine learning models, including Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Multi-Layer Perceptron, and Categorical Boosting, were applied. Among these, the Gradient Boosting model demonstrated superior predictive capability, overcoming both traditional regression methods and other machine learning algorithms as validated through the Taylor diagram and ranking system (i.e., r = 0.998, R² = 997, Root mean square error = 0.075, Variance Accounted For = 99.50%, Mean Absolute Percentage Error = 0.385%, Alpha 20 Index = 100, and performance index = 0.975). These results highlight the ability of machine learning techniques to provide a more effective and reliable prediction of aggregate engineering properties based on petrographic data. This approach offers significant advantages in the preliminary assessment of aggregate suitability, contributing to more efficient resource allocation in construction projects.

Indexed as

Construction projectsGradient BoostingPredictive accuracySalt RangeStatistical analyses

Identifiers

PMID39738623
PMCPMC11685727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.