Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738622›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2024

Applying a three-dimensional curved lumbar spine model to simulate surgery for training residents in pedicle screw insertion.

Volga Ozturk, Anil Murat Ozturk, Mehmet Asim Ozer, Figen Govsa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Volga OzturkDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Anil Murat OzturkDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Mehmet Asim OzerDepartment of Anatomy, Digital Imaging and 3D Modelling Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova, 35100, Izmir, Turkey.
Figen GovsaDepartment of Anatomy, Digital Imaging and 3D Modelling Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova, 35100, Izmir, Turkey. fgovsa@yahoo.com.

Funding

Ege University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit Project number 23860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe challenges of spinal surgery can be overcome by deeply understanding the anatomical and surgical complexities of the region through the use of model simulators. This study investigates the impact of digitally designed simulators, specifically lumbar spinal models with abnormal curvature, on preoperative planning and their effectiveness as training tools. The study addresses challenges in spine surgery, such as unique deformities, classification issues, and associated abdominal structure abnormalities.

methodsTwenty life-sized lumbar spine models exhibiting lateral curvature, intervertebral rotation, asymmetry in spinal segments, and disc abnormalities were 3D printed for 20 trainees to practice pedicle screw placement across five levels. A detailed survey evaluated the residents' views on the anatomical realism of the model and its surgical application, focusing on screw sizes, procedure duration, placement accuracy, materials, and surgical techniques. The study emphasized understanding the anatomical bone structure, identifying lumbar spinal curvature, decision-making, pedicle placement, the development of surgical strategies, and the educational value of the simulator. It rated their understanding on a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates very low understanding and 5 signifies extremely high understanding.

resultsPost-practice surveys revealed that the primary challenge for residents was determining the correct direction for pedicle screw placement, with the model's loss of resistance being perceived as less realistic. Despite this, the simulated environment was found to be beneficial, with realistic procedural steps. Significant differences emerged in residents' perceptions regarding the identification of scoliosis levels (3.5), imitation of bone tissue (4.30), anatomical positioning of the pedicle start (3.55), and preparation for posterior deformity correction (4.7). The model proved to be an effective teaching tool, particularly in enhancing manual skills for pedicle screw placement (4.9), preparation for deformity correction (4.7), explaining surgery to patients and their families (4.8), and potentially reducing surgery time (4.6).

conclusionThe scoliotic model received high ratings for its appropriateness in screw placement, earning a 'very good' evaluation (4.2). Notably, its contribution to learning pedicle screw placement was rated very positively (4.7), highlighting its effectiveness as a valuable training tool. Scoliotic models play a crucial role in helping orthopedists understand patient-specific deformities and enhance preoperative preparation, ultimately contributing to improved surgical outcomes.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceInternship and ResidencyLumbar VertebraeModels, AnatomicPedicle ScrewsSimulation TrainingHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalPrinting, Three-DimensionalAnatomic modelPostgraduate educationResident educationSpine surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.