Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738608›Full record

SynthesisArchives of dermatological research2024

Publication count of matched dermatology applicants reported in literature: a systematic review.

Robyn Okereke, Karen Szauter, Nneka Ede

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of dermatological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robyn OkerekeUniversity of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA. robynokereke@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8770-328X
Karen SzauterUniversity of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Nneka EdeDell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Competitive medical residency specialties, such as Dermatology, have historically placed lofty demands on applicants. We focus on the seemingly increasing demands on applicants to publish, as well as discuss and quantify the delivery of these expectations in the literature. The objective of this article is to systematically review evidence regarding the number of publications possessed by successful applicants to a dermatology residency program. We conducted a systematic review of the literature published before or by April 2023, with no lower limit regarding the publishing date using PubMed, Google Scholar, and OVID. Our summary included 41 publications that specifically cited the number of publications by National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) applicants successfully matching to US dermatology programs. We extracted additional applicant details (demographics, publication type) as available. We found two major categories of cumulative publications reported in the literature: NRMP scholarly works and peer-reviewed indexed publications. Summarizing reports from 21 papers between 2011 and 2022, NRMP showed the overall mean amongst matched applicants to be 14.77 publications, with an upward trend over time. The mean was 3.23 peer-reviewed indexed publications (PIPs) for successful dermatology applicants amongst 11 articles in the literature. Amongst matched dermatology applicants, an average of 3 PIPs is markedly lower than the inflated average count of 15 NRMP scholarly works (which includes non-published research) that is often reported in the literature and national statistics. The distinction between these values must be recognized in the literature, as well as communicated to forthcoming dermatology applicants.

Indexed as

DermatologyInternship and ResidencyHumansPublicationsPublishingUnited StatesDermatology applicantDermatology researchMatched applicants

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.