ArticleScientific reports2024
Automatic ovarian follicle detection using object detection models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Integrative Profiling of the Ovarian Reserve using Ultrasound and MRI Data by Comparative Analysis: A Systematic Review.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Pooled it
- The utility of artificial intelligence and deep learning to automate and accelerate follicle counts in human ovarian tissue†.Biology of reproduction · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ovaries are of paramount importance in reproduction as they produce female gametes through a complex developmental process known as folliculogenesis. In the prospect of better understanding the mechanisms of folliculogenesis and of developing novel pharmacological approaches to control it, it is important to accurately and quantitatively assess the later stages of ovarian folliculogenesis (i.e. the formation of antral follicles and corpus lutea). Manual counting from histological sections is commonly employed to determine the number of these follicular structures, however it is a laborious and error prone task. In this work, we show the benefits of deep learning models for counting antral follicles and corpus lutea in ovarian histology sections. Here, we use various backbone architectures to build two one-stage object detection models, i.e. YOLO and RetinaNet. We employ transfer learning, early stopping, and data augmentation approaches to improve the generalizability of the object detectors. Furthermore, we use sampling strategy to mitigate the foreground-foreground class imbalance and focal loss to reduce the imbalance between the foreground-background classes. Our models were trained and validated using a dataset containing only 1000 images. With RetinaNet, we achieved a mean average precision of 83% whereas with YOLO of 75% on the testing dataset. Our results demonstrate that deep learning methods are useful to speed up the follicle counting process and improve accuracy by correcting manual counting errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.