Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738599›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Automatic ovarian follicle detection using object detection models.

Maya Haj Hassan, Eric Reiter, Misbah Razzaq

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maya Haj HassanINRAE, CNRS, Université de Tours, PRC, Nouzilly, 37380, France.
Eric ReiterINRAE, CNRS, Université de Tours, PRC, Nouzilly, 37380, France.
Misbah RazzaqINRAE, CNRS, Université de Tours, PRC, Nouzilly, 37380, France. misbah.razzaq@inrae.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovaries are of paramount importance in reproduction as they produce female gametes through a complex developmental process known as folliculogenesis. In the prospect of better understanding the mechanisms of folliculogenesis and of developing novel pharmacological approaches to control it, it is important to accurately and quantitatively assess the later stages of ovarian folliculogenesis (i.e. the formation of antral follicles and corpus lutea). Manual counting from histological sections is commonly employed to determine the number of these follicular structures, however it is a laborious and error prone task. In this work, we show the benefits of deep learning models for counting antral follicles and corpus lutea in ovarian histology sections. Here, we use various backbone architectures to build two one-stage object detection models, i.e. YOLO and RetinaNet. We employ transfer learning, early stopping, and data augmentation approaches to improve the generalizability of the object detectors. Furthermore, we use sampling strategy to mitigate the foreground-foreground class imbalance and focal loss to reduce the imbalance between the foreground-background classes. Our models were trained and validated using a dataset containing only 1000 images. With RetinaNet, we achieved a mean average precision of 83% whereas with YOLO of 75% on the testing dataset. Our results demonstrate that deep learning methods are useful to speed up the follicle counting process and improve accuracy by correcting manual counting errors.

Indexed as

Deep LearningOvarian FollicleAnimalsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAntral follicleArtificial intelligenceComputer vision annotationCorpus luteumDeep learningFolliculogenesisObject detectionReproduction

Identifiers

PMID39738599
PMCPMC11685387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.