Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738596›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2024

Comparing auditory and visual aspects of multisensory working memory using bimodally matched feature patterns.

Işıl Uluç, Tori Turpin, Parker Kotlarz, Kaisu Lankinen, Fahimeh Mamashli, Jyrki Ahveninen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Işıl Uluç *Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, CNY 149, 13th St, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. iuluc@mgh.harvard.edu.
Tori Turpin *Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, CNY 149, 13th St, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
Parker KotlarzAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, CNY 149, 13th St, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
Kaisu LankinenAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, CNY 149, 13th St, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
Fahimeh MamashliAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, CNY 149, 13th St, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
Jyrki AhveninenAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, CNY 149, 13th St, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.

Funding

Training and Dissemination CoreP41EB030006 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Susie Yi Huang · 2020 to 2026
$10.9M
Mapping the intrinsic functional organization of auditory cortex in individual subjects using 7T MRIR01DC017991 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI AHVENINEN, JYRKI · 2019 to 2023
$4.0M
Decoding parametric attributes of auditory working memories from human brain activityR01DC016915 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI AHVENINEN, JYRKI · 2018 to 2022
$3.0M
Non-invasive measures of multisensory cortical feedforward and feedback influencesR01DC016765 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI AHLFORS, SEPPO PENTTI, AHVENINEN, JYRKI · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB030006NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016765NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC016765NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016915NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC016915NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory (WM) reflects the transient maintenance of information in the absence of external input, which can be attained via multiple senses separately or simultaneously. Pertaining to WM, the prevailing literature suggests the dominance of vision over other sensory systems. However, this imbalance may be stemming from challenges in finding comparable stimuli across modalities. Here, we addressed this problem by using a balanced multisensory retro-cue WM design, which employed combinations of auditory (ripple sounds) and visuospatial (Gabor patches) patterns, adjusted relative to each participant's discrimination ability. In three separate experiments, the participant was asked to determine whether the (retro-cued) auditory and/or visual items maintained in WM matched or mismatched the subsequent probe stimulus. In Experiment 1, all stimuli were audiovisual, and the probes were either fully mismatching, only partially mismatching, or fully matching the memorized item. Experiment 2 was otherwise the same as Experiment 1, but the probes were unimodal. In Experiment 3, the participant was cued to maintain only the auditory or visual aspect of an audiovisual item pair. In Experiments 1 and 3, the participant's matching performance was significantly more accurate for the auditory than visual attributes of probes. When the perceptual and task demands are bimodally equated, auditory attributes can be matched to multisensory items in WM at least as accurately as, if not more precisely than, their visual counterparts.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionMemory, Short-TermPhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionAdolescentAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung AdultAudiovisual working memoryAuditory working memoryFeature discriminationMultimodal working memoryMultisensory working memoryVisual working memory

Identifiers

PMID39738596
PMCPMC11848833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.