ArticleScientific reports2024
Classification of cervical cancer using Dense CapsNet with Seg-UNet and denoising autoencoders.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of artificial intelligence in cervical cytology: a systematic review of deep learning models, datasets, and reported metrics.Frontiers in big data · 2025Pooled it
- Dual-stage 3D medical image segmentation integrating learnable prompt generation and memory attention.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Recent advancements in the application of artificial intelligence-based approaches for screening, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cervical cancer.Oncology reviews · 2026Review
- Visual diagnostics for female genital schistosomiasis and the opportunity for improvement using computer vision.Parasitology · 2025Review
- Hierarchical in-out fusion for incomplete multimodal brain tumor segmentation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer is one of the deadly diseases that affects women, which requires periodic examinations to identify and treat any cancerous tumors at a preliminary stage. The most prevalent examination tool for cervical cancer prompt identification is the cervical smear (Pap smear) testing; however, due to human negligence, this examination method has an elevated probability of negative findings. Cervical cancer classification using machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) has been extensively studied to enhance the conventional diagnostic process. Robust classification results were achieved through the pre-segmented imagery in most current investigations. Conversely, cellular grouping makes reliable cervical cellular segmentation difficult. Additionally, the deep learning methods used in the existing works perform poorly on a multiclass classification when the data distribution is skewed, which is common in the cervical cancer dataset. To mitigate these restrictions in cervical cancer research, this proposed work uses a combination of four different deep-learning methods in various phases of this research. The proposed work is segregated into five phases: pre-processing, data augmentation, segmentation, feature extraction, and classification. Contrast maximization is performed in the pre-processing phase, and the images are augmented using Multi-modal Generative Adversarial Networks (m-GAN) in the second phase. In the third phase, cervical cancer images are segmented using the Seg-UNet model, which is forwarded to the feature extraction phase that employs denoising autoencoders. Finally, the classification is implemented using the Dense CapsNet model and applied to the SIPaKMeD dataset to categorize between normal, abnormal, and benign classes. The proposed system achieves an accuracy of 99.65%, which is higher than the other works in the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.