ArticleScientific reports2024
Feature optimization-guided high-precision and real-time metal surface defect detection network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- EGONet: edge guided omni-directional attention with multi-scale bilateral feature integration for surface defect detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Optimized image preprocessing strategies for enhanced neural network-based defect detection in industrial automation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- High-Sensitivity Defect Inspection for Unpatterned Wafers via Integrating Dark-Field Scattering and Diffraction Phase Microscopy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Few-shot cross-episode adaptive memory for metal surface defect semantic segmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Towards intelligent railway monitoring: A novel hybrid deep learning architecture for railway obstacle detection.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Existing computer vision-based surface defect detection techniques for metal materials typically encounter issues with defect overlap, significant differences within classes, and similarity between defect samples. These issues compromise feature extraction accuracy and result in missed and false detections. This study proposed a feature optimization-guided high-precision and real-time metal surface defect detection network (FOHR Net) to improve defect feature expressiveness. Firstly, the network presents a multi-layer feature alignment module that enhances the feature information relevant to the target defect by fusing shallow and deep features using a multi-layer feature alignment approach. Secondly, the slice features are reorganized using a dual-branch feature recombination module, and the channel-level soft attention is applied to produce the channel-optimized feature map. The dual-branch transformation stage's output features are adaptively merged, which may effectively lower feature information loss, improve feature expressiveness, and allow the model to collect useful feature information. Finally, we carried out thorough tests on the NEU-DET, GC10-DET, and APDDD datasets. Our results show that our average mean average precision is superior to other widely used defect detection techniques, with 78.3%, 70.5%, and 65.9%, respectively. Furthermore, we further illustrated the efficacy of our approach using several ablation trials and visualization detection outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.