Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738521›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Feature optimization-guided high-precision and real-time metal surface defect detection network.

Sixian Chan, Suqiang Li, Hongkai Zhang, Xiaolong Zhou, Jiafa Mao, Feng Hong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sixian ChanThe College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, 310023, China.
Suqiang LiSchool of Electronic and Information Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei, 230601, China.
Hongkai ZhangSchool of Electronic and Information Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei, 230601, China.
Xiaolong ZhouThe College of Electrical and Information Engineering, Quzhou University, Quzhou, 324000, China. xiaolong@ieee.org.
Jiafa MaoThe College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, 310023, China.
Feng HongSchool of Information Science and Technology, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou, 310000, China. hongfeng@zjsru.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61906168National Natural Science Foundation of China 62176237National Natural Science Foundation of China 62272267Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China LY23F020023Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China LZ23F020001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing computer vision-based surface defect detection techniques for metal materials typically encounter issues with defect overlap, significant differences within classes, and similarity between defect samples. These issues compromise feature extraction accuracy and result in missed and false detections. This study proposed a feature optimization-guided high-precision and real-time metal surface defect detection network (FOHR Net) to improve defect feature expressiveness. Firstly, the network presents a multi-layer feature alignment module that enhances the feature information relevant to the target defect by fusing shallow and deep features using a multi-layer feature alignment approach. Secondly, the slice features are reorganized using a dual-branch feature recombination module, and the channel-level soft attention is applied to produce the channel-optimized feature map. The dual-branch transformation stage's output features are adaptively merged, which may effectively lower feature information loss, improve feature expressiveness, and allow the model to collect useful feature information. Finally, we carried out thorough tests on the NEU-DET, GC10-DET, and APDDD datasets. Our results show that our average mean average precision is superior to other widely used defect detection techniques, with 78.3%, 70.5%, and 65.9%, respectively. Furthermore, we further illustrated the efficacy of our approach using several ablation trials and visualization detection outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID39738521
PMCPMC11685404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.