ArticleScientific reports2024
Prediction of time-dependent bearing capacity of concrete pile in cohesive soil using optimized relevance vector machine and long short-term memory models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of off-road agricultural traction in situ using large scale machine learning and neurocomputing models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Application of the metaheuristic algorithms to quantify the GSI based on the RMR classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Thermodynamically consistent modeling of granular soils using physics-informed neural networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prediction of loess collapsibility coefficient using bayesian optimized random forest model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluating the RMR correlation with the rock mass wave velocity using the meta-heuristics algorithms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Developing advanced datadriven framework to predict the bearing capacity of piles on rock.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present investigation employs relevance vector machine (RVM) and long short-term memory (LSTM) models to predict the time-dependent bearing capacity of concrete piles. Each RVM model (SRVM) is configured by each linear, polynomial, gaussian, sigmoid, laplacian, and exponential kernel function. Each SRVM model has been optimized by each genetic (GA_SRVM) and particle swarm optimization (PSO_RVM) algorithm. Moreover, the double kernel-based RVM models (DRVM) have been employed and optimized by each GA (GA_DRVM) and PSO (PSO_DRVM) algorithm. Thus, an extensive comparison among 33 RVM (6SRVM + 6GA_RVM + 6PSO_RVM + 5DRVM + 5GA_DRVM + 5PSO_DRVM) has been carried out. Conversely, the Adam, root mean squared propagation and stochastic gradient descent with momentum algorithms have optimized the LSTM model. Each optimized RVM and LSTM model has been trained and tested by 100 and 26 datasets. In addition, the effect of structural and database multicollinearities has been analyzed on models' prediction capabilities. The performance index (PI), the variance accounted for (VAF), performance (R), mean absolute error (MAE), normalized mean bias error (NMBE), and root mean square error (RMSE) matrices have analyzed the prediction capabilities of each model. The comparison of 33 RVM and 3 LSTM models reveals that the genetic algorithm-optimized Gaussian kernel function-based SRVM model, i.e., UBC7, has been recognized as the optimal performance model with the RMSE = 146.3962 kPa, PI = 1.85, VAF = 94.60, NMBE = 30.1379 kPa, MAE = 105.7009 kPa, and R = 0.9727, close to the ideal values. Furthermore, the score (= 56), Wilcoxon (= 94.95% confidence), uncertainty (= 1
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.