Trial reportScientific reports2024
The effect of stroboscopic vision training on the performance of elite curling athletes.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Stroboscopic training effects on athletic performance and cognitive function across populations, purposes, and skill types: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of stroboscopic visual training on reaction time and decision-making ability in athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Pooled it
- Olympic Ice Sports: A Narrative Review and Perspectives Toward Milano-Cortina 2026.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2026Review
- Stroboscopic visual training in basketball: a narrative review integrating cross-sport evidence and a hypothetical framework based on the information processing model.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Article
- Review
- The effects of stroboscopic visual training on coordination, change-of-direction, and decision-making performance in collegiate basketball players.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The expert's fixation: cognitive efficiency and attentional selectivity in wheelchair curling athletes across the expertise spectrum.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Acute biomechanical responses to stroboscopic vision during change-of-direction tasks in elite rugby athletes.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- The effects of stroboscopic vision training on physical performance in athletes: a systematic review.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- The effects of stroboscopic visual training on human cognitive function and motor performance: a systematic review.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- Cognitive visual strategies are associated with delivery accuracy in elite wheelchair curling: insights from eye-tracking and machine learning.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of the study was to investigate the impacts of four weeks of stroboscopic vision training (SVT) and four weeks of temporal feedback training (TFT) on elite curling athletes' duration judgment, as well as stone delivery performance (delivery speed control and accuracy). Thirty national-level curling athletes were selected as participants and randomly assigned to either the SVT group (wearing stroboscopic glasses: the strobe frequencies increased weekly from Level 1 to Level 4.), the TFT group (using a timing system to provide feedback on stone delivery time), or a control group. Apart from the differences in training methods, the intervention programme was identical across the three groups, with each group performing stone delivery training three times per week for 40 min per session. The training regimen consisted of a 'ladder' drill targeting the house (effective zones 4-10), with the sequence of training increasing and then decreasing in complexity. Repeated measures ANOVA (3 × 2) and post-hoc tests (Bonferroni) were used to analyse the effects of different training methods. The results showed that the four-week training intervention produced significant interactions in duration judgment (p = 0.005, f = 0.692) and accuracy (p = 0.001, f = 0.805). SVT significantly improved duration judgment (p < 0.001, d = 2.374) and delivery speed control (p = 0.011, d = 1.421). TFT significantly improved delivery accuracy (p = 0.015, d = 1.364). Four weeks of SVT and TFT both improved duration judgment, curling speed control performance among elite curling athletes. In terms of accuracy improvement, four weeks of TFT yielded greater benefits than SVT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.