Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738461›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A deep learning-based ADRPPA algorithm for the prediction of diabetic retinopathy progression.

Victoria Y Wang, Men-Tzung Lo, Ta-Ching Chen, Chu-Hsuan Huang, Adam Huang, Pa-Chun Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Victoria Y WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine, USC Roski Eye Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Men-Tzung LoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, National Central University, Research Center Building 3, Room 404, 300 Zhongda Rd, Zhong-Li, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ta-Ching ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chu-Hsuan HuangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Adam HuangDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, National Central University, Research Center Building 3, Room 404, 300 Zhongda Rd, Zhong-Li, Taoyuan, Taiwan. adamhuan@gmail.com.
Pa-Chun WangDepartment of Medical Research, Cathay General Hospital, 280 Jen-Ai Rd. Sec.4 106, Taipei, Taiwan. pachunwang@cgh.org.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As an alternative to assessments performed by human experts, artificial intelligence (AI) is currently being used for screening fundus images and monitoring diabetic retinopathy (DR). Although AI models can provide quasi-clinician diagnoses, they rarely offer new insights to assist clinicians in predicting disease prognosis and treatment response. Using longitudinal retinal imaging data, we developed and validated a predictive model for DR progression: AI-driven Diabetic Retinopathy Progression Prediction Algorithm (ADRPPA). In this retrospective study, we analyzed paired retinal fundus images of the same eye captured at ≥ 1-year intervals. The analysis was performed using the EyePACS dataset. By analyzing 12,768 images from 6384 eyes (2 images/eye, taken 733 ± 353 days apart), each annotated with DR severity grades, we trained the neural network ResNeXt to automatically determine DR severity. EyePACS data corresponding to 5108 (80%), 639 (10%), and 637 (10%) eyes were used for model training, validation, and testing, respectively. We further used an independent e-ophtha dataset comprising 148 images annotated with microaneurysms, 118 (75%) and 30 (25%) of which were used for training and validation, respectively. This dataset was used to train the neural network Mask Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Mask-RCNN) for quantifying microaneurysms. The DR and microaneurysm scores from the first nonreferable DR (NRDR) image of each eye were used to predict progression to referable DR (RDR) in the second image. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values indicating our model's performance in diagnosing RDR were 0.963, 0.970, 0.968, and 0.971 for the trained ResNeXt models with input image resolutions of 256 × 256, 512 × 512, 768 × 768, and 1024 × 1024 pixels, respectively. In the validation of the Mask-RCNN model trained on the e-ophtha dataset resized to 1600 pixels in height, the recall, precision, and F1-score values for detecting individual microaneurysms were 0.786, 0.615, and 0.690, respectively. The best model combination for predicting NRDR-to-RDR progression included the 768-pixel ResNeXt and 1600-pixel Mask-RCNN models; this combination achieved recall, precision, and F1-scores of 0.338 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.228-0.451), 0.561 (95% CI: 0.405-0.714), and 0.422 (95% CI: 0.299-0.532), respectively. Thus, deep learning models can be trained on longitudinal retinal imaging data to predict NRDR-to-RDR progression. Furthermore, DR and microaneurysm scores generated from low- and high-resolution fundus images, respectively, can help identify patients at a high risk of NRDR, facilitating timely treatment.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDeep LearningDiabetic RetinopathyDisease ProgressionAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerPrognosisRetrospective StudiesDeep learningDiabetic retinopathyDisease progressionPredictive modelReferable diabetic retinopathy

Identifiers

PMID39738461
PMCPMC11686301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.