Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738431›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A machine learning-based clinical predictive tool to identify patients at high risk of medication errors.

Ammar Abdo, Lyse Gallay, Thibault Vallecillo, Justine Clarenne, Pauline Quillet, Vincent Vuiblet, Rudy Merieux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ammar AbdoInstitut d'Intelligence Artificielle en Santé, CHU de Reims, Université de Reims Champagne- Ardenne, Reims, F-51100, France. ammar.abdo@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4569-2744
Lyse GallayInstitut d'Intelligence Artificielle en Santé, CHU de Reims, Université de Reims Champagne- Ardenne, Reims, F-51100, France.
Thibault VallecilloDepartment of Pharmacy, CHU de Reims, Reims, F-51100, France.
Justine ClarenneDepartment of Pharmacy, CHU de Reims, Reims, F-51100, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8400-2174
Pauline QuilletDepartment of Pharmacy, CHU de Reims, Reims, F-51100, France.
Vincent VuibletInstitut d'Intelligence Artificielle en Santé, CHU de Reims, Université de Reims Champagne- Ardenne, Reims, F-51100, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1959-326X
Rudy MerieuxInstitut d'Intelligence Artificielle en Santé, CHU de Reims, Université de Reims Champagne- Ardenne, Reims, F-51100, France.ORCID 0009-0004-6643-8555

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A medication error is an inadvertent failure in the drug therapy process that can cause serious harm to patients by increasing morbidity and mortality and are associated with significant economic costs to the healthcare system. Medication reconciliation is the most cost-effective intervention and can result in a 66% reduction in medication errors. To improve patient safety, we developed a machine learning-based tool that prioritizes patients at risk of medication errors upon admission to the hospital to ensure that they undergo medication reconciliation by clinical pharmacists. The data were collected from the electronic health records of patients admitted to Reims University Hospital who underwent medication reconciliation between 2017 and 2023. The data from 7200 patients were used to train four machine learning-based models based on 52 variables in the development dataset. These models were used to prioritize admitted patients according to their likelihood of being exposed to a medication error. Our models, particularly the voting classifier model, demonstrated good performance (a recall of 0.75, precision of 0.65, F1 score of 0.70, AUROC of 0.74 and AUCPR of 0.75). In a retrospective evaluation simulating real-life use, the voting classifier model successfully identified 45% of the total patients selected who were found to have at least one unintended discrepancy compared to 21% when using the existing tool. The positive experimental results of this tool showed a superior improvement of 113% over the existing tool by targeting patients at risk of medication errors upon admission to Reims University Hospital.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMedication ErrorsMedication ReconciliationAdultAgedElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SafetyRetrospective StudiesMachine learningMedication errorsMedication reconciliationPatient safetyPrediction model

Identifiers

PMID39738431
PMCPMC11685956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.