ArticleScientific reports2024
A machine learning-based clinical predictive tool to identify patients at high risk of medication errors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of an AI-powered hospital admission prediction dashboard to guide medication reconciliation in the emergency department: a retrospective before-after study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Quality and patient safety surveillance systems in healthcare settings: a rapid realist review.BMJ open · 2026Review
- A modified Delphi consensus study to support and enhance Parkinson's disease management.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Beyond Human Error: Building Intelligent Resilience for Medication Safety in the ICU.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A medication error is an inadvertent failure in the drug therapy process that can cause serious harm to patients by increasing morbidity and mortality and are associated with significant economic costs to the healthcare system. Medication reconciliation is the most cost-effective intervention and can result in a 66% reduction in medication errors. To improve patient safety, we developed a machine learning-based tool that prioritizes patients at risk of medication errors upon admission to the hospital to ensure that they undergo medication reconciliation by clinical pharmacists. The data were collected from the electronic health records of patients admitted to Reims University Hospital who underwent medication reconciliation between 2017 and 2023. The data from 7200 patients were used to train four machine learning-based models based on 52 variables in the development dataset. These models were used to prioritize admitted patients according to their likelihood of being exposed to a medication error. Our models, particularly the voting classifier model, demonstrated good performance (a recall of 0.75, precision of 0.65, F1 score of 0.70, AUROC of 0.74 and AUCPR of 0.75). In a retrospective evaluation simulating real-life use, the voting classifier model successfully identified 45% of the total patients selected who were found to have at least one unintended discrepancy compared to 21% when using the existing tool. The positive experimental results of this tool showed a superior improvement of 113% over the existing tool by targeting patients at risk of medication errors upon admission to Reims University Hospital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.