ArticleScientific reports2024
Roughness integration across fingers within compared with across the hands.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Feeling a texture typically involves sliding the fingers of a hand across that surface or rubbing the surface between the thumb and another digit. Texture signals appear to be integrated across the digits of a hand with perceived roughness at one finger swayed in the direction of texture touched by another finger of the same hand. To date, one study has reported similar integrative effects when the pairs of digits belong to different hands. This contrasts with observations from studies of tactile detection and tactile attention where the patterns of interactions between the digits depend on whether the digits belong to the same hand or not. The present experiments revisit the question of hand identity on multidigit roughness perception using two interval forced choice (2IFC) discrimination and single interval absolute magnitude estimation (AME). Pairs of tactile gratings were actively touched using the thumb and index fingers from the same or different hands. Attention was directed towards roughness at the thumb and index finger sensations were to be ignored. For both discrimination and ratings tasks, roughness perceived at the thumb varied with the textures touched by the index finger suggesting integration of roughness cues from the two digits. This integration occurred despite differences in the two tasks such as working memory requirements. Notably, roughness signals were integrated when originating in pairs of digits on the same hand but not when from different hands. These findings add to a body of evidence based on experiments using different stimuli and tasks, suggesting that hand identity affects interactions across the digits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.