Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738400›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Comparison of algorithms using deep reinforcement learning for optimization of hyperbolic metamaterials.

Kenta Hamada, Hui-Hsin Hsiao, Wakana Kubo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kenta HamadaDivision of Advanced Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 2- 24-16 Naka-cho, Koganei-shi, Tokyo, 184-8588, Japan.
Hui-Hsin HsiaoDepartment of Engineering Science and Ocean Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan.
Wakana KuboDivision of Advanced Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 2- 24-16 Naka-cho, Koganei-shi, Tokyo, 184-8588, Japan. w-kubo@cc.tuat.ac.jp.

Funding

The Hitachi Global Foundation 1574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A hyperbolic metamaterial absorber has great potential for improving the performance of photo-thermoelectric devices targeting heat sources owing to its broadband absorption. However, optimizing its geometry requires considering numerous parameters to achieve absorption that aligns with the radiation spectrum. Here, we compare three algorithms using deep reinforcement learning for the optimization of a hyperbolic metamaterial absorber. By analyzing the absorption spectra obtained from the three algorithms with limited number of datasets, we assessed the prediction accuracy of each algorithm. Our findings indicate that relying on a single algorithm for optimization, particularly with a small number of datasets, can lead to misestimations in structural optimization. This underscores the importance of using multiple algorithms to ensure accurate and reliable optimization results. Finally, by utilizing the optimal algorithm, we achieved to increase the power generation of the metamaterial thermoelectric conversion by five times.

Indexed as

AlgorithmDeep reinforcement learningHyperbolic metamaterialsMetamaterial thermoelectric conversion

Identifiers

PMID39738400
PMCPMC11685470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.