ArticleScientific reports2024
Comparison of algorithms using deep reinforcement learning for optimization of hyperbolic metamaterials.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intelligent power control using deep neural networks and regularized learning for shipboard microgrid.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A hyperbolic metamaterial absorber has great potential for improving the performance of photo-thermoelectric devices targeting heat sources owing to its broadband absorption. However, optimizing its geometry requires considering numerous parameters to achieve absorption that aligns with the radiation spectrum. Here, we compare three algorithms using deep reinforcement learning for the optimization of a hyperbolic metamaterial absorber. By analyzing the absorption spectra obtained from the three algorithms with limited number of datasets, we assessed the prediction accuracy of each algorithm. Our findings indicate that relying on a single algorithm for optimization, particularly with a small number of datasets, can lead to misestimations in structural optimization. This underscores the importance of using multiple algorithms to ensure accurate and reliable optimization results. Finally, by utilizing the optimal algorithm, we achieved to increase the power generation of the metamaterial thermoelectric conversion by five times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.