Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738390›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Utilising AI technique to identify depression risk among doctoral students.

Changhong Teng, Chunmei Yang, Qiushi Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Changhong TengSchool of Education, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.
Chunmei YangSchool of Education, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China. ycm70@bit.edu.cn.
Qiushi LiuMediaTek Inc, Beijing, 10016, China.

Funding

Beijing Institute of Technology 2024CX13003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phenomenon that the depression risk among doctoral students is higher than that of other groups should not be ignored. Despite this, studies specifically addressing depression risk in doctoral students are relatively scarce, and existing findings are not universally applicable. Using neural network feature extraction technology, this study aims to investigate the factors contributing to the high depression risk of doctoral students and effectively identify doctoral students at depression risk, so as to propose corresponding improvement strategies to prevent and intervene doctoral students with depression risk for universities. Based on the data from the 2019 Nature Global Doctoral Student Survey, we first screened 13 highly relevant features from a total of 37 features potentially related to the risk of depression among doctoral students by Random Forest algorithm. Subsequently, we trained the optimal prediction model to predict the doctoral students with depression risk using a Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), achieving an accuracy of 89.09% on the test set. Additionally, this study constructed a group portrait of doctoral students at risk of depression, and found that overwork, poor work-life balance, and poor supervisor-student relationship, etc., were typical characteristics among these students. Finally, we proposed several improvement strategies for higher education institutions. Our research offers a new perspective on utilising artificial intelligence (AI) methods to tackle educational challenges, particularly in the identification and support of doctoral students at risk of depression, thereby enhancing their mental health.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDepressionStudentsAdultEducation, GraduateFemaleHumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerRisk FactorsUniversitiesDepression riskDoctoral studentsGroup portraitMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39738390
PMCPMC11685965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.