ArticleScientific reports2024
A multi-dimensional semantic pseudo-relevance feedback framework for information retrieval.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pre-trained models have garnered significant attention in the field of information retrieval, particularly for improving document ranking. Typically, an initial retrieval step using sparse methods such as BM25 is employed to obtain a set of pseudo-relevant documents, followed by re-ranking with a pre-trained model. However, the semantic information captured by pre-trained models from sentences or passages is usually only applied to document ranking, with limited use in query expansion. In fact, the semantic information within pseudo-relevant documents plays a critical role in selecting appropriate query expansion terms. Therefore, this paper proposes a novel approach that leverages pre-trained models to extract multi-dimensional semantic information from pseudo-relevant documents, offering more possibilities for query expansion. First, traditional sparse retrieval methods are used in the initial retrieval stage to ensure efficiency, and term-level weights are calculated based on statistical information. Then, the pre-trained model encodes both the query and the sentences and passages from the documents, extracting sentence-level and passage-level semantic similarities to the query. Finally, these semantic weights are combined with the term-level weights to generate an improved query for the second retrieval round. We conducted experiments on five TREC datasets and a medical dataset, showing improvements in official metrics such as MAP and P@10. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of utilizing multi-dimensional semantic information from pseudo-relevant documents to optimize query expansion. This study offers new insights into how the semantic information of pseudo-relevant documents can be effectively harnessed to enhance retrieval performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.