Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738319›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Socio-economic disparities in the utilization of improved sanitation facilities among Indian households.

Pradeep Kumar, Nihal Hasan, Rahul Rajak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Recent epidemiological and management approaches for cholera in India.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pradeep KumarIndependent Researcher, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4259-820X
Nihal HasanIndependent Researcher, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0009-0000-8302-8102
Rahul RajakPopulation & Development, Institute of Development Studies Kolkata, 27/D, DD Block, Sector 1, Bidhannagar, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. rajrahul0906@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6009-581X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the significant improvement in sanitation coverage , utilization of improved sanitation still does not reach the optimal level across all socioeconomic groups in India. Therefore, achieving improved sanitation facilities and reducing all forms of inequality United Nations Sustainable Development Goal [SDG 6.2] by 2030 is a big challenge to the most populous country in the world. Given this backdrop, this study examines the socioeconomic status-related inequality in the utilization of improved sanitation facilities among Indian Households. The study utilized fifth round of National Family Health Survey (NFHS); a national representative cross-sectional survey of India conducted in 2019-2021. Logistic regression was applied to estimate the effect of various predictors on utilization of improved sanitation facilities. We also used decomposition analyse to identify the factors responsible for utilization of improved sanitation. The results indicate that 69% of Indian households utilized improved sanitation facilities. The study highlights that young and unmarried household heads, lower education, poor household wealth status, living in rural areas, and marginalized social groups had lower access to improved sanitation facilities. The multivariate regression analysis suggested that households belonging to richer [AOR: 14.0; 95%, CI: 13.6-14.3] and richest [AOR: 46.7; 95%, CI: 45.0-48.5] wealth quintiles have 14 and 47-times higher odds of having sanitation facility than households which belong to poorest quintile respectively. The decomposition analysis suggested that 11 to 18% of inequality was explained by the geographical region and social group of household heads. The concentration curve of utilization of improved sanitation was more concentrated in Central and Eastern part of Indian households (Concentration Index: 0.51 and 0.47), which has reduced to 0.17 and 0.22 during NFHS-4 to NFHS-5. We also found that 68 districts out of 707 districts in India had less than 50% utilization of improved sanitation facilities. The study concludes that households with a better socioeconomic status were more able to access improved sanitation. Thus, inclusive strategies are needed to reduce socioeconomic inequality at the micro level and strengthen ongoing policies.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsSanitationSocioeconomic FactorsAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedRural PopulationSocial ClassToilet FacilitiesYoung AdultConcentration indexImproved sanitationIndiaSocio-economicinequality

Identifiers

PMID39738319
PMCPMC11685393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.