ArticleScientific reports2024
Imaging pathology in archived cornea with Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy including tissue reprocessing for volume electron microscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pathological classification of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy into several types and their relationships with CTG18.1 expansion repeats.The Journal of pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is a common sight-threatening condition characterised by pathological changes in the posterior cornea. Here we report observations by light, transmission and volume scanning electron microscopy on changes in the endothelium and matrix associated with the characteristic deformations of Descemet's membrane, termed guttae. Specimens were archived full-thickness human corneal tissue, removed during graft surgery, that had been fixed, stained and embedded by conventional processing methods for examination by transmission electron microscopy more than 40-years previously. Intact archived samples can be extremely valuable where, as with FECD, new cell-based methods of therapy now avoid excision of the full cornea thickness and any tissue excised is inferior for study. Volume electron microscopy, in particular serial block face scanning electron microscopy (SBF SEM), employing backscatter electron detection from resin-embedded specimens, has become an invaluable technique for 3D imaging of biological samples. However, archived specimens are normally considered unsuitable for imaging as conventional processing methods generate low backscatter electron yield. To overcome this for SBF SEM, we subjected epoxy resin-embedded specimens to de-plastination, then applied additional contrasting agents, uranyl acetate and lead acetate, prior to re-embedding. Selected regions of interest in the new resin blocks were examined in a scanning electron microscope equipped for SBF SEM and serial image datasets acquired. Enhanced contrast enabled 3D reconstruction of endothelium and guttae in Descemet's membrane over large tissue volumes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.