ArticleScientific reports2024
Normative values of spinal and peripheral proprioception in position sense among healthy adolescents and young adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of proprioceptive deficits with curve progression and treatment outcomes in subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A prospective cohort study with 1 year of follow-up.North American Spine Society journal · 2026Article
- A substantial proportion of subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis display spinal and peripheral proprioceptive deficits.Bone & joint open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Establishing normative values and understanding how proprioception varies among body parts is crucial. However, the variability across individuals, especially adolescents, makes it difficult to establish norms. This prevents further investigation into classifying patients with abnormal proprioception. Therefore, the primary objective was to address the knowledge gap using three-dimensional motion analysis to capture position sense in adolescents and young adults. The secondary objective was to evaluate the relationship between position sense and age, as well as the interrelationships of position senses across various anatomical sites. Healthy participants aged 10 to 25 years were included. Six position sense tests were implemented on the trunk, neck, elbow, and knee. Data were captured using a three-dimensional motion capture system. The proprioceptive measure was the absolute repositioning error (the difference between the destinated starting position and the corresponding self-reproduced ending position) of each test. A total of 103 participants were recruited. We found that only spinal proprioception was associated with chronological age, whereas peripheral proprioception was not. Subgroup analyses revealed that subjects aged 10 to 13 years had the poorest proprioceptive performance. The normative values of proprioception of various body parts were, trunk flexion-extension test = 25° ± 12°; trunk lateral-flexion test = 23° ± 10°; trunk axial-rotation test = 26° ± 11°; left neck rotation test = 2° ± 1°; right neck rotation test = 3° ± 1°; left elbow flexion test = 5° ± 3°; right elbow flexion test = 5° ± 2°; left knee extension test = 3° ± 2°; right knee extension test = 3° ± 1°. The normative values of proprioception in position sense provided in this study may help identify individuals with proprioceptive deficits and inform targeted interventions to improve proprioception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.