ArticleScientific reports2024
Optimizing VGG16 deep learning model with enhanced hunger games search for logo classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence with deep convolutional neural network-based clinical decision-making on kidney Oncology using multimodal imaging.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A multi-scale feature fusion of deep learning network for classifying acute leukemia genetic subtypes from blood smear images.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Multi-strategy integrated Gorilla Troops Optimizer for solving global optimization and engineering design problems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven cybersecurity system for internet of things using self-attention deep learning and metaheuristic algorithms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate classification of logos is a challenging task in image recognition due to variations in logo size, orientation, and background complexity. Deep learning models, such as VGG16, have demonstrated promising results in handling such tasks. However, their performance is highly dependent on optimal hyperparameter settings, whose fine-tuning is both labor-intensive and time-consuming. Swarm intelligence algorithms have been widely adopted to solve many highly nonlinear, multimodal problems and have succeeded significantly. The Hunger Games Search (HGS) is a recent swarm intelligence algorithm that has shown good performance across various applications. However, the standard HGS still faces limitations, such as restricted population diversity and a tendency to get trapped in local optima, which can hinder its effectiveness. In this paper, we propose an optimized deep learning architecture called EHGS-VGG16 designed based on the VGG16 model and boosted by an enhanced Hunger Games Search (EHGS) algorithm for hyperparameter tuning. The proposed enhancement to HGS involves modified search strategies, incorporating the concepts of "local best" and a "local escaping mechanism" to improve its exploration capability. To validate our approach, the evaluation is conducted in three folds. First, the EHGS algorithm is evaluated through 30 real-valued benchmark functions from the IEEE CEC2014 suite. Second, a custom-developed VGG16 model is tested on the Flickr-27 logo classification dataset and compared against state-of-the-art deep learning models such as ResNet50V2, InceptionV3, DenseNet121, EfficientNetB0, and MobileNetV2. Finally, EHGS is integrated into the VGG16 model to optimize its hyperparameters. The experimental results show that VGG16 outperformed the other counterparts with an accuracy of 0.956966, a precision of 0.957137, and a recall of 0.956966. Moreover, the integration of EHGS further improved classification quality by 3%. These findings highlight the potential of combining evolutionary optimization techniques with deep learning for enhanced accuracy in log classification tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.