ArticleScientific reports2024
Attention-guided convolutional network for bias-mitigated and interpretable oral lesion classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Updates, Applications and Future Directions of Deep Learning for the Images Processing in the Field of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of oral lesions, early indicators of oral cancer, is a complex clinical challenge. Recent advances in deep learning have demonstrated potential in supporting clinical decisions. This paper introduces a deep learning model for classifying oral lesions, focusing on accuracy, interpretability, and reducing dataset bias. The model integrates three components: (i) a Classification Stream, utilizing a CNN to categorize images into 16 lesion types (baseline model), (ii) a Guidance Stream, which aligns class activation maps with clinically relevant areas using ground truth segmentation masks (GAIN model), and (iii) an Anatomical Site Prediction Stream, improving interpretability by predicting lesion location (GAIN+ASP model). The development dataset comprised 2765 intra-oral digital images of 16 lesion types from 1079 patients seen at an oral pathology clinic between 1999 and 2021. The GAIN model demonstrated a 7.2% relative improvement in accuracy over the baseline for 16-class classification, with superior class-specific balanced accuracy and AUC scores. Additionally, the GAIN model enhanced lesion localization and improved the alignment between attention maps and ground truth. The proposed models also exhibited greater robustness against dataset bias, as shown in ablation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.