Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738208›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A stacked CNN and random forest ensemble architecture for complex nursing activity recognition and nurse identification.

Arafat Rahman, Nazmun Nahid, Björn Schuller, Md Atiqur Rahman Ahad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arafat RahmanUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.
Nazmun NahidKyushu Institute of Technology, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Björn SchullerTechnical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. schuller@tum.de.
Md Atiqur Rahman AhadDepartment of Computer Science and Digital Technologies, University of East London, London, UK. mahad@uel.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nursing activity recognition has immense importance in the development of smart healthcare management and is an extremely challenging area of research in human activity recognition. The main reasons are an extreme class-imbalance problem and intra-class variability depending on both the subject and the recipient. In this paper, we apply a unique two-step feature extraction, coupled with an intermediate feature 'Angle' and a new feature called mean min max sum to render the features robust against intra-class variation. After intermediate and final feature extraction, we use an ensemble of a random forest classifier and a stacked convolutional neural network (S-CNN) model to detect activities and users. Unlike traditional CNN, the S-CNN takes the input feature channels in separate pathways with equal importance, which makes it robust to intra-class variation and produces accurate results. We apply this method to two benchmark open-source nurse care activity data sets. Our algorithm is robust enough to recognize both activity and user (Nurse) simultaneously. During the recognition process, this algorithm automatically finds the important features in the data set. Using this algorithm, the highest testing accuracies were achieved for activity recognition on the two (publicly available in IEEE DataPort) benchmark data sets: The CARECOM Nurse Care Activity (70.6% accuracy) and the Heiseikai Nurse Care Activity data set (85.7% accuracy). Moreover, the highest accuracy achieved for user identification on Data Set 1 and Data Set 2 is 78.2% and 92.7%, respectively.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeural Networks, ComputerHumansNursesRandom ForestCNNData augmentationDeep learningEnsemblesFeature engineeringHuman activity recognitionNursing activity recognitionUser identification

Identifiers

PMID39738208
PMCPMC11685546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.