ArticleScientific reports2024
Graphene metamaterial solar absorber using Al-TiN-Fe for efficient solar thermal energy conversion and optimization using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next generation graphene based MXene metamaterial multicylinder resonator solar absorber optimized with machine learning for conceptual solar dryer mining applications.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Proposing a novel structure for the implementation of a graphene metamaterial-based tunable band pass/stop spatial THz plasmonic filter.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimization of ultra-wideband metamaterial MXene-based polarization-insensitive solar absorber using machine learning for solar heater application.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The contributed absorber design in graphene addition with the displacement of three materials for resonator design in Aluminum (Al), the middle substrate position with Titanium nitride (TiN), and the ground layer deposition by Iron (Fe) respectively. For the absorption validation highlight, the best four absorption wavelengths (µm) of 0.29, 0.58, 1, and 2 are also selected to indicate the changes in radiation outputs for every observation. With the displacement of wavelength and bandwidth configuration, the current absorber is observed at 97.32% (more than 97%) for 1.5-2.5 µm wavelength range (1000 nm bandwidth) and above 95% rate (95.38%) is displayed by the 2000 nm bandwidth due to 0.5 and 2.5 µm wavelength separation. The 2800 nm band rate demonstration by 0.2-3 µm wavelength separation verifies 92.42%. For every analysis in this work, the output radiation is shown in ultraviolet region (UV), visible spectrum (Vis), and near-infrared (NIR) area respectively. In the following distribution of the current absorber, the design development in lithography and step-by-step, parametric assignment and AM configuration, radiation analysis for each parameter changes in graph presentation and conclusion. Additionally, the ML approach is applied to reduce the time required in the study. The current solar absorber in the new design can be generated for the multi-solar purposes of water heating, lighting, ventilation, charging for electronic devices, and electric vehicle transportation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.