ArticleScientific reports2024
Impact of plasma discharge pressure on implant surface properties and osteoblast activities in vacuum-assisted plasma treatment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical evaluation of cold plasma surface activation using different plasma systems on early implant stability: a randomized controlled within-patient trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Plasma Treatment to Remove Titanium Surface Contaminants and Improve Implant Biocompatibility: An In Vitro Study.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nonthermal plasma has been extensively utilized in various biomedical fields, including surface engineering of medical implants to enhance their biocompatibility and osseointegration. To ensure robustness and cost effectiveness for commercial viability, stable and effective plasma is required, which can be achieved by reducing gas pressure in a controlled volume. Here, we explored the impact of reduced gas pressure on plasma properties, surface characteristics of plasma-treated implants, and subsequent biological outcomes. Implant materials were treated with plasmas under varying discharge conditions, with pre-pumping times of 10 s and 20 s, thereby modulating the pressure during plasma treatments. Through optical emission spectroscopy, we demonstrated that the 5 Torr operational condition, achieved by 20-s pre-pumping, generated a greater density of excited nitrogen species and provided more stable plasma compared to the 16 Torr condition, achieved by 10-s pre-pumping. We then assessed the surface hydrophilicity, chemical composition, protein adsorption, and osteoblast activities on plasma-treated implants compared with those of untreated controls. Our results reveal that the 5 Torr condition significantly enhances removal of carbon-based impurities and increased protein adsorption, leading to improved cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. In particular, implants treated under the 5 Torr condition showed significantly higher carbon-based impurity reduction and osteoblast differentiation performance compared to those treated under the 16 Torr condition. These findings suggest that optimizing gas pressure in plasma devices is critical for effectively controlling excited nitrogen radicals, which improves plasma surface modification and enhances the biocompatibility of implant surfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.