Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738189›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Operation Polypharmacy: a pharmacist-led ambulatory care clinic design and evaluation for older patients.

Nicha Tantipinichwong, Michelle S Keller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicha TantipinichwongCedars-Sinai Medical Network, Pharmacy Services, Beverly Hills, CA, USA. Nicha.Tantipinichwong@cshs.org.
Michelle S KellerLeonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unintended consequences of polypharmacy pose significant risks to older adults. The complexities of managing numerous medications from multiple prescribers demand a comprehensive approach to mitigate harms. Pharmacist-led clinics have been shown to improve outcomes in patients with diabetes and hypertension. Pharmacist-led clinics focused on broader issues of polypharmacy have the potential to lead to better outcomes for older patients. We describe the design and the pre-post evaluation of a polypharmacy clinic. We conducted a retrospective standardized chart review of polypharmacy visits during October and November 2022. Systematic data collection was completed by March 2023. Our review included 84 polypharmacy visits; the average patient age was 80. Patients were on 17.3 (range: 7-33) medications at-visit and 15.9 (range: 4-30) medications post-visit, with an average of 1.4 medications deprescribed per visit. In patients with many medications (range: 17-33 medications) at the polypharmacy consult visit, 2.6 medications were deprescribed post-visit. In patients with a moderate number of medications (range: 7-16 medications) at-visit, 0.9 medications were deprescribed post-visit. Medication list accuracy increased to 72% at follow-up visits compared to initial visits (66%). 44% of patients were on 1 or more Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMs) and 24% were on 1 or more Drugs with Strong Anticholinergic Properties (DSAPs) at initial visits. At follow-up visit, the proportion of patients with PIMs decreased by 28%, and the proportion of patients with DSAPs decreased by 54%. Our evaluation demonstrates the value of a polypharmacy clinic in improving medication list accuracy and deprescribing PIMs and DSAPs.

Indexed as

PharmacistsPolypharmacyAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareAmbulatory Care FacilitiesFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesDrug-related problemsGeriatricPharmacist-ledPolypharmacyPotentially inappropriate medications

Identifiers

PMID39738189
PMCPMC11685990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.