Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738183›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Analyzing bacterial networks and interactions in skin and gills of Sparus aurata with microalgae-based additive feeding.

I M Cerezo, E A Herrada, J Fernández-Gracia, M I Sáez-Casado, J A Martos-Sitcha, M A Moriñigo, S T Tapia-Paniagua

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

I M CerezoDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, CEI·MAR-International Campus of Excellence in Marine Science, University of Malaga, Málaga, Spain.
E A HerradaDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Balearic Islands, Palma de Mallorca, Illes Balears, Spain.
J Fernández-GraciaInstituto de Física Interdisciplinar y Sistemas Complejos IFISC (CSIC-UIB), Palma de Mallorca, Illes Balears, Spain.
M I Sáez-CasadoDepartment of Biology and Geology, CEI·MAR-International Campus of Excellence in Marine Science, University of Almería, Almería, Spain.
J A Martos-SitchaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Marine and Environmental Sciences, CEI·MAR-International Campus of Excellence in Marine Science, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.
M A MoriñigoDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, CEI·MAR-International Campus of Excellence in Marine Science, University of Malaga, Málaga, Spain.
S T Tapia-PaniaguaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, CEI·MAR-International Campus of Excellence in Marine Science, University of Malaga, Málaga, Spain. stapia@uma.es.

Funding

Campus de excelencia del Mar (CEIMAR) Proyecto de Jóvenes Investigadores (CEIJ-C05)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inclusion of microalgae in functional fish diets has a notable impact on the welfare, metabolism and physiology of the organism. The microbial communities associated with the fish are directly influenced by the host's diet, and further understanding the impact on mucosal microbiota is needed. This study aimed to analyze the microbiota associated with the skin and gills of Sparus aurata fed a diet containing 10% microalgae. Sequencing of the V3-V4 variable region of 16S rDNA molecules was employed to determine the composition of the microbial communities. The study employed bioinformatics tools to explore the taxonomic composition and interactions of the microbiota, emphasizing the integration of taxonomic analysis and abundance correlation networks as crucial for understanding microbial community dynamics and the impact of functional diets. The results indicated that there were not changes in the composition of the skin and gill microbiota. However, notable differences were observed in the bacterial interaction networks. The skin and gill networks exhibited distinct overall patterns influenced by their respective environments and functions. The gill network showed a highly connected and redundant structure, increasing its resilience, while the skin network showed a more fragmented structure, suggesting a potentially greater vulnerability to perturbations. Key taxa, such as Acinetobacter and Polaribacter, were identified as critical for maintaining the stability and functionality of these microbial ecosystems. Polaribacter could demonstrate potential protection against pathogens through negative interactions. These tentative studies open up an additional avenue to consider, such as the interactions among bacterial communities, as well as new proposals to corroborate these findings. These observations underline the importance of understanding the composition and interactions within bacterial groups to fully grasp the dynamics of microbial communities.

Indexed as

BacteriaGillsMicroalgaeMicrobiotaSea BreamSkinAnimal FeedAnimalsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDietGillsMicroalgaeMicrobiotaNetworkSkinSparus aurata

Identifiers

PMID39738183
PMCPMC11686111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.